Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goldberry who wrote (2463)	1/21/2002 5:37:50 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

I would suggest it is time to just ignore him, a.handbag who just registered on Sunday in order to make a defensive reply for Peter is extremely suspect and points out the measures this individual goes to in order to try to tell the world his buy and hold strategy is the only way. ------------ This is a good one. My record of tasking the likes of Stan and Lorne and YOU has gone on for the last 9 months or more. Each and every time I present fact after fact , data after data, to show my side. When the other side presents its arguments I deliver an attacked of ever more fact , ever more data to refute any and all they say. Their only recourse becomes not more fact or data from their side but insults and name calling and then to run away from the discussion with their tails between their legs. Case in point is your response to me about your recent outrageous claims over the holidays. You (GRAHAM) responded by asking that I supply the postings and evidence to support what I had said. I did that. I went through and presented a detailing of your postings, outlining what you had said , what you had done during the period of that claim of yours. It clearly shows your exaggerated claims. I asked for some evidence by way of any postings I may have missed to substantiate your side. NOTHING FORTHCOMING. WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The measures I go through to make my case or dispute others fanciful claims are DATA and FACT. Always have been. Nice little cop-out of yours in your defence though what it has to do with you responding to back yourself I don't know . To prove what you had said to be true about your claim. I guess all will have to judge your non-response as confirmation of my allegations. The sooner you "traders" or "blind supporters of" stick to issues rather than making these outrageous claims of yours to con joe average trust holder to trade so he can lose and you can win. The sooner I will refrain from taking the claims apart and showing them for what they really are. ----------------------------------- For the past year my system has worked quite well as I sold trusts and stocks I held earlier last year to concentrate on trusts, stocks and convertible debentures which I was confident would continue to throw off good income without concern for dividend cuts and would appreciate in value due to the drop in interest rates. Looking forward I am now selling some of these purchases at healthy gains (REALIZED PROFITS) ------------------ My problem wih the likes of this, is that there is nothing presented , nothing offered , so that it can be verified. Joe average is just suppose to believe it as gospel. When the likes of the above are criticized or questioned or are asked to be verified. Well the whole thing ends right there. From day one I have offerred for all to see and verify , a detailing of my method , what and when I have bought, my results. When questioned as to its authenticity I point to the exact date and time stamped evidence from these past postings of mine. What I provide on my part, I also expect and demand from the other side. That is the only true way that joe average here will get all the facts. And it is only with all the facts that he will come to make the right decision about the right course for him. These ""traders"" seem to have a real problem with that. MY QUESTION WHY ????????????????????? That they are not forthcoming should signal a definite WARNING SIGN. ----------------------------------

To: Goldberry who wrote (2463)	1/21/2002 6:07:17 PM
From: a.handbag.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11633

No I'm not in cahoots with Peter Pan and yes I support your call for brevity. My concern is to separate PP's style of advocacy, which is unreadable, from his chosen strategy, which is defensible. Of course successful market timing is the holy grail of investing. The question remains, can it be done. My answer would be --- maybe, some of the time. No matter what you tell me, I cannot capture a single dollar of your past triumphs. Now if you would reveal your thoughts about the future I will take them into consideration, and perhaps share in your future gains.