Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (42502)	1/22/2002 10:24:58 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The Committees were APPOINTED. Evasion. If the entire civil gov't and the military were against such action, a man who inherited the Presidency would never have appointed it. "Gee, my first day in office. Why don't I start by pissing EVERYBODY off?" I never said I was a Canadian Are you? A simple yes or no will suffice. Anything else will be considered more evasion. lthough their nuclear program is geared mainly to peaceful exploitation of the energy. Possession of nuclear power plants does not make a nation a nuclear power. You know that. We all know that. But the fact still remains that innocent people were murdered Yeah, people get killed in wars. "Innocent people" too. Get used to it. But because of religion they did not. An appallingly inadequate excuse. Did they expect special consideration from the people they had started a war with because they were Shinto. Why, then, was the US not entitled to special consideration, particularly on Dec. 7, 1941, because it is primarily Christian? We are discussing the American choice; as that is the one that was active rather than passive 1. Their choice in continuing to prosecute the war against the US was certainly an active choice. 2. Their choice on Dec. 7, 1941 was appallingly active. Cut the crap. They had a choice and made it. And took the consequences.