Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Scott who wrote (56841)	1/22/2002 9:07:35 AM
From: Stock Farmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Thought provoking post. "an appreciating asset which is what the stock indexes have proven to be over time will reflect more buyers than sellers eventually" Or is it the converse, which is to say that since '71 there have been more buyers than sellers, in which case one would expect assets to have appreciated? Left me pondering the effects should there be more sellers than buyers, and the situations in which we might experience that condition as a norm. "...so any argument about the value is really an argument about time and time and value are relative..." Well said. I suppose then by using the same measure, we could take the very reassuring view that since 2000 the NASD is extremely undervalued? John