SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rich4eagle who wrote (221172)1/22/2002 9:43:31 PM
From: RON BL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Another Racial 'Hate Crime' in Jasper, Texas?

A motorist in Jasper, Texas, is accused of running over and killing a hitchhiker of another race. Sound like the nationally publicized car-dragging death of James Byrd Jr. in Jasper?

If you wonder why you haven't heard any outcry about the new murder, or even heard about the case at all, here's why: This time the suspect is black and the victim is white.

According to authorities:

The victim, Ken Bimbo Tillery, visited a Jasper trailer park Friday night and asked around for a ride home. Blake Little and three others offered him a lift in Little's pickup truck after agreeing on a price of $5 for gasoline. The price increased to $50 by the time they arrived in Pineland. Tillery tried to escape and was chased.

"A couple of the guys jump him and beat up on him, then the driver of the car runs over the guy," said Jasper County Sheriff Billy Rowles. All were suspected of drinking and smoking crack.

Little, who is black, was arrested Sunday on murder charges, the Associated Press reported Monday.

Rowles, who investigated the 1998 murder of Byrd, was quick to claim that race did not appear to be a factor in Tillery's murder. There apparently has been no outcry yet that this case is a "hate crime."

Question 1: If this isn't a "hate crime," is it a "love crime" when someone is beaten and run over?

Question 2: Would it be a "hate crime" if Little were white and Tillery nonwhite? Just as in Orwell's "Animal Farm," under "hate crimes" everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.

Question 3: Why are supporters of "hate crime" legislation so obsessed with the criminal's motive? Tillery is just as dead as Byrd was.

Question 4: Why do most media consider this case not newsworthy? We scan the news wires nightly and saw no mention of this murder until a Texas reader of NewsMax pointed out the case today.
The murder of Byrd sparked national outrage, and during the 2000 presidential campaign the pro-Democrat pressure group National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ran a vile ad trying somehow to blame Byrd's killing on George W. Bush, who as Texas governor had opposed bogus "hate crime" legislation.

Question 5: What added punishment would leftists like to give those who commit "hate crimes"? Two of Byrd's killers await execution, something liberals are always crying about, and the third is spending life in prison on the taxpayers' dime.

As the reader who sent us this news tip wrote: "I guess we won't be reading about that in any newspapers or watching it on TV news, huh?" You got that r



To: rich4eagle who wrote (221172)1/22/2002 9:44:56 PM
From: RON BL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Are you like your buddy AD? Are you being paid to spread hate thought and mind control ?

Why is the liberal hero being paid by a terrorist to represent a terrorist ?



To: rich4eagle who wrote (221172)1/22/2002 9:46:10 PM
From: RON BL  Respond to of 769670
 
another of your sick buddies.


'Animal Rights' Terrorists Brag of Criminal 'Achievements'
Jeff Johnson, CNSNews.com
Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2002
A self-proclaimed "animal rights" group is bragging about the crimes undertaken by supporters in 2001. But medical researchers say the activists are endangering the lives of humans and the research animals they claim to want to protect.
Animal Liberation Front (ALF) says individuals and groups who oppose the "animal abuse industry" carried out 137 "direct illegal actions" in North America in 2001. Those crimes include:

Six arsons or attempted arsons resulting in more than $1.6 million in damages.

Thirteen thefts of a total of nearly 5,000 animals.

Fifty-five acts of vandalism ranging from those with little cost to one attack in which ALF claims $65,000 damage was done.

Four "cyber attacks" on Web sites of organizations alleged to contribute to "animal abuse."
This list does not include crimes included in the report taken "in defense of the Earth and all her inhabitants" such as spiking trees in national forests to prevent logging, or burning genetically modified crops.

The group claims its supporters "rescued" 3,000 minks, 1,047 ducks, 469 chickens, 200 horses, 62 pigeons, 50 geese, 44 beagles, 28 rabbits, 12 perch, 10 ferrets, two hermit crabs and one snail in 2001.

But Don McKinney, a spokesman for Coulston Foundation, says such attacks do much more harm than good to the animals the activists are trying to "liberate."

"They supposedly are wanting to make life better for these animals," McKinney noted. "But, to date, all they've done is cost the people who have to take care of the animals hundreds of thousands and millions of dollars."

Coulston is a not-for-profit biomedical research facility accredited by the College of American Pathologists. The experiments it performs on chimpanzees are among the final steps in confirming the safety of new vaccines for human use.

McKinney feels the activists haven't fully considered the consequences of their actions.

Fanatics Let the 'Rescued' Animals Starve

"The majority of these [stolen] animals, particularly the minks and laboratory mice, die from exposure, starvation. They get eaten by predators," he explained. "All they've really done is just sign the death warrant for the majority of these animals."

Despite their methodology and the amount of property stolen, damaged, or destroyed, ALF insists it is nonviolent, and not a terrorist group.

"One simply cannot compare the events of Sept. 11 to the illegal direct actions taken by underground groups and individuals for animal and earth liberation," wrote ALF spokesman David Barbarash in a section of the report titled "September 11, 2001."

"To compare this to the actions of people who work to save animal lives and our planet while explicitly not using violent means is," he said, "frankly, ridiculous."

But Jackie Calnan, president of Americans for Medical Progress, disagrees.

"I reject the ALF claim that they are a nonviolent group," Calnan said. "Simply by setting a fire, they are putting lives in danger ... they put firefighters at risk. They put first responders at risk."

Coulston Foundation was the victim of one of the arsons listed in the ALF report. The Sept. 20 firebombing of a maintenance building at Coulston's White Sands Research Center in Alamogordo, N.M., was the "most damage inflicted by the ALF in 2001." The blaze caused an estimated $1 million damage.

'Reign of Terror'

"These people have run such a horrible reign of terror for so long that you have scientists who no longer want to participate in the process," McKinney said, "because they are in fear for their reputations, for their families, for their friends, for their lives."

Coulston's employees do not want any information about them released, he explained, for fear of reprisals by ecoterrorists.

Calnan says online activities by "animal rights" groups also have the scientific community "very concerned."

"Scientists are targeted very specifically, their home addresses, pictures, details of their family life and such," are listed on some Web sites, she explained. "On more mainstream animal rights sites, we're seeing a rhetoric of hatred ... very vicious language that is coming out now about scientists who work with animals in research."

The third element Calnan described is the listing of instructions on how to construct explosive and incendiary devices on the Web sites of so-called underground "animal rights" groups.

CNSNews.com located and downloaded such instructions from one of the Web sites Calnan described, and confirmed that the site is maintained by an "animal rights" group. The URL for that site has been omitted from this story in the interest of safety.

For its part, ALF seems to be unconcerned with the ability of law enforcement to stop its admittedly criminal actions. The group deems new anti-terrorism laws, passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, as virtually useless against "animal rights" activity.

"The impacts from all these new laws will, contrary to their stated intended purpose, not stem the flow of economic sabotage actions or animals being liberated," the ALF report claims. "Activists involved with underground groups like the ALF and ELF [Earth Liberation Front] will not be affected by these laws, or any attempts by law enforcement to shut them down."

Calnan says that bravado is perhaps the greatest reason for scientists involved in legitimate animal research to be wary.

"Our concern is that the combustion of these elements may influence some individuals," Calnan said, "that individual scientists may be targeted, and we're concerned that it is just a matter of time before there is some physical injury."

Calls to the Federal Bureau of Investigation on Monday for comment on this story