Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (13802)	1/22/2002 11:38:56 PM
From: gem-x	Respond to of 74559

Miish-man, reeelllaaaxxx..

To: mishedlo who wrote (13802)	1/22/2002 11:39:59 PM
From: gem-x	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 74559

NASDAQ 3000 Jun 4, 2002. Ludicros (sic) Pruposterous (sic) Brillyant (sic) OHHH GAWWWD

To: mishedlo who wrote (13802)	1/23/2002 12:30:34 AM
From: bobby beara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

I still do not know why you were banned but the calls were totally atrocious. QQQ 2300 2400 2700 in the upcoming DAYS or weeks. Still laughing about those.<<<< mish, i don't follow all your posts, but were you guilty of calling for much lower lows during much of the fall or early winter of 01? my guess from your general bias is yes, correct me if i'm wrong, most bears made 'atrociously' bad calls that we were going to new lows after we rallied off the sept bottom. even if you didn't do that, it was correct for the market to teach the arrogant bears some humility during this rise of sept. lows and it did in many cases.