Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: qgambit who wrote (156558)	1/23/2002 3:46:40 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

qgambit, Re: "I find this very hard to believe. I will be very very surprised if this is indeed true." It's not surprising at all. GeForce2 MX doesn't exactly have "state of the art" graphics by today's standards. In fact, after nVidia launches the GeForce4 MX next month, the former will start looking pretty obsolete. I would think that this kind of performance from the i845G would be a minimum goal for Intel - and it shouldn't be too difficult, either, since they've had 3 years of experience in making graphics cores since they launched the i810 (whose graphics core was also found in the i815). The question is whether this minimum performance gives Intel an advantage in the integrated graphics space, since VIA and SiS are similarly well behind the "state of the art" (nVidia and future nForce chipsets not withstanding). wbmw