SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Thermoelectric - SOFC Fuel cells (GLE:TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stephen O who wrote (5424)1/23/2002 8:53:51 PM
From: Supervalue  Respond to of 6016
 
Winning the mind gallery thats why I don't post negative
remarks, great input on fuel cells recently from poster Stephen O.

Check this out
evworld.com
read fuel cell power generation gives note to GLE efforts

Cheers !!



To: Stephen O who wrote (5424)1/24/2002 9:42:33 AM
From: caveat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6016
 
Article actually says:

``The draw on the batteries was estimated at more than 4.5 kilowatts. With any existing technology the batteries would have been drained flat in one and a half minutes,''

If the load only drew 0.3kw, then 4.2kw going into the "machine". 4.9kw at 48v = 93.75A for a 300w load requiring only 300w48V 6.25A.

To someone who skipped every tech or science related course on the way to receiving a BA in fine arts, this makes a lot of sense. The rest of us must be missing something.

LOL