SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tommaso who wrote (145686)1/23/2002 5:36:22 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
>>But I guess the subject of gold is like the subject of gun control. You seem to be expected either to be for it or against it. Rational discussion is not acceptable.<<

I am not a gold-bug. My point was that the dollar is not a static measure -- that's all. The economic cost of producing gold is the oppty cost of not producing something else that someone might want.

The cost of production is a floor -- anyone can say -- higher prices stimulate more demand which increases production -- I can't argue with that. But that argument doesn't tell you where an equilibrium price is -- it certainly does not have to be at the price of production -- it's not gold vs the price to produce it -- but gold versus what others might be wanting to exchange their currency for, right?



To: Tommaso who wrote (145686)1/23/2002 7:30:58 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
here's a follow up.. maybe the answer is there. haven't read it yet

Message 16951415