SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kirby49 who wrote (81033)1/24/2002 2:12:39 AM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116762
 
<I was able to take six pictures, although amateurish,
and will let you know when and where you can view them>

Put them here for you: pages.prodigy.net

P.S. Rotated image one so it looks upright



To: kirby49 who wrote (81033)1/24/2002 5:34:42 AM
From: IngotWeTrust  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116762
 
Hi, Bob. I look forward to seeing your album originals! Thanks for including me in those with whom you will share your photographic endeavors. It sounds like you and your friend had a good time yesterday. Was the Croesus on display?

Any other strikingly beautiful gem quality minerals in the Gem Room as you recall?

So glad the weather was nice enough for you to get out and have a little fun being a rockhound yesterday at the ROM! Now, you can understand part of my visceral connection with the yellow metal, yes?

I look forward to your reply and your URL of your photographs.

gold_tutor



To: kirby49 who wrote (81033)1/25/2002 2:26:58 AM
From: Richnorth  Respond to of 116762
 
The little gold nuggets in your pictures look like crap ejected from the butthole of some constipated person. And the big 'uns look like power-dumped crap! You should have done far better.

You don't have tremor in your hands, do you? Ever heard of camera stands and higher mega-pixel digital cameras?

How can a Toronto, ON, and Upper-Canada and WASPY wise guy/gal like you misspell mineralogist? (There is no o where the a is). If you misspelt it once, it is OK but not when you repeated the same error umpteen times. How careless can you get? No wonder the pictures are so crappy.

BTW, other misspellings I have seen in the last little while include "pitard" and "excessible" instead of petard and accessible.

Misspellings should not have been made, especially not by those individuals who consider themselves so very superior and that others are "crap".