SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (156640)1/23/2002 10:42:57 PM
From: C_Johnson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Hi,

Yeah, haven't been around much. Lots of stuff going on in the business world. Keeps me from doing too much surfing and posting. Despite all the down-sizing there is a lot of activity taking place on the business development front. It looks like some of the stuff that stuck to the wall during the boom-times is making a comeback. This time it is being developed with an ROI attached. No doubt, it will be another interesting year.

On wafer size, UMC is pushing the 300mm envelope as much as any. I would say they have *competitive* process technology but in terms of *bleeding-edge* capability they are certainly not as advanced as an Intel, IBM or TSMC (to name a few). Of course, that does not mean they can't get there.

It's pretty amazing how far the foundries have come over the past eight years. They have out-paced the growth of the semiconductor industry (33% CAGR over 8 years). I expect to see an even more-accelerated foundry development cycle from those participating in the next boom spot: China.

Here's some of the text from that link:

January 23, 2002

TAIPEI (AFX-ASIA) - Advanced Micro Devices Inc is likely to take a 20-30 pct stake in United Microelectronics Corp via the acquisition of UMC ADRs to be offered by State Stabilisation Fund, the United Evening News reported, citing rumours circulating in institutional investor circles.

The State Stabilisation Fund is to dispose of its existing holdings in UMC common shares via an ADR issue after the Lunar New Year, the paper added.


I didn't realize that link required a password. I think you can register for free to receive a good number of the stories on that site. Sorry about the confusion.

Adios for now,

Carl



To: Tony Viola who wrote (156640)1/23/2002 11:13:54 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
How does UMC stack up against other foundries?

UMC has pretty good technology but foundries by nature are about 1/2 generation behind at any given time. It's their need to provide a generic solution that is both their strength and weakness. AMD won't get the performance they're looking for so they must be going for a cost advantage, but why would a foundry be cheaper than their own "World Class Yields"? <G>

EP