SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gao seng who wrote (221605)1/23/2002 11:59:13 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
gao, I have been very glad to see McCain standing for America. I also like that NYT story that makes it look like Enron turds can be found all over mr bill's shoes

poor dems, faces in the dog poop again LOL.... no make that <DG>

tom watson tosiwmee



To: gao seng who wrote (221605)1/24/2002 12:11:28 AM
From: d.taggart  Respond to of 769669
 
Gao,I would not bet a nickle on Mc Cain,he has slipped over to the dark side it appears,war hero/victim or not............2 trillion dollars are taken out of American citizens pockets each year to support a sick spending spree that has no limits,both parties included,manufacturing is suffering its death throes,government is adding people and dollars like there is no end to the money supply,dems have won the war and soon our country will pay dearly for the greedy pols with the backing of idealogical media supporting the feed.America is out of gas,there is no prescription other than to scrap the system and begin anew.While each seperate taxing body was sucking the lifeblood out of what used to be a society where the little guy had a chance Americans slopped at the trough and no matter who our President is America is on a slippery slope heading for broke.Go shop at walmart have dinner at Macs,rent a movie and kiss you azz goodbye.......Have a good day,GGGGGGGGAll politicians suk it is just a matter of who they suck it from and how!



To: gao seng who wrote (221605)1/24/2002 3:20:28 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Looked up investigative reporter Labaton...He's done several including some articles below....priscilla comments here about three of SL's on the front page of the NY Times all on the same day..........March 6, 1997.............

manslife.com

The Headlines
for
March 6, 1997

By Priscilla Turner

The New York Times

Aide to First Lady
Was Given Check
At White House

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Donor Is Investigated

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$50,000 Contribution Is First
Known Instance of Money
Being Passed There

USA Today:

Rules target
home health
care abuses

The New York Post:

O.J. FACES
NEW FIGHT
FOR KIDS

Browns plan to appeal over custody

Other stuff in the news:

• Oh, we got trouble! When two of the three front-page-above-the-fold stories in The New York Times have Stephen Labaton's byline on them, you know it's not going to be good day at the Casa Blanca.

The headline story, all about Maggie "The Defiant One" Williams, was broken last night by NBC news. Stephen Labaton expands:


"The chief of staff to Hillary Rodham Clinton accepted a $50,000 donation to the Democratic Party in 1995 in the White House from a California businessman who has emerged as a control figure in the criminal and Congressional investigations into improper fund-raising by the Democrats, Administration officials said tonight..."

The donation, made by Johnny "The Hustler" Chung now becomes "the first known instance in which a campaign check was handed to an Administration official at the White House during the last four years." And as we know, even if Al Gore does not, that is "wrong."

Wait a minute! Reading ahead, I see "Proud" Al Gore isn't the only Clintonista who sees no evil.

Labaton continues: "White House aides defended Miss Williams today, saying that she had simply passed along a check that was given to her by a frequent White House guest and devoted fan of Mrs. Clinton..."

"Devoted fan?" What's that mean, Steve? Don't leave us hanging! Let's move over to the Wall Street Journal for a sec -- the news, not the right-wing-editorial side!

The Journal:

"In an interview with [NBC], Mr. Chung's lawyer, Brian Sun, indicated the donation may have been in exchange for access to the White House and Mrs. Clinton. On the day he gave the check, Mr. Chung and six Chinese government officials had their photograph taken with Mrs. Clinton. It was the second day in a row that Mr. Chung, whom White House officials have described as having 'a crush' on the first lady, had been to the White House."

Just a cotton pickin' minute! The 50 K was for "access" to HRC? Even someone with a far less lively imagination than I might interpret that somewhat salaciously, don't you think? That Bill C. is one tolerant hubby!

So how did the White House's designated $candal $pokesgal, Ms. Ann Lewis, handle this latest hot potato? The Post's Thomas Galvin:

"'[Maggie W.] recalls an occasion when Johnny Chung wanted to give her a check for the DNC,' said...Ann Lewis.

"'She does not remember any details about the conversation or any other details about the check or the day of the conversation.'

"Lewis added that it was the 'only such conversation [Williams] remembers' with Johnny Chung, but said she hadn't asked Williams whether she had similar conversations with anyone else..."

More from Ann Lewis, via USA Today:

"'This was all done according to White House procedure. If staff members get contributions either by mail or hand-delivered at the White House, their responsibility is to forward it to the person or entity who can properly accept it,' Lewis said.

"Lewis also said, 'The act of handling and forwarding a contribution ... does not violate the Hatch Act,' which bars federal employees from engaging in political activity.

"However, NBC News quoted Republican former U.S. attorney Joseph diGenova as saying that Williams had broken federal law. 'The White House is completely wrong. It is illegal to receive federal campaign funds on property at the White House or at the Executive Office Building,' which is part of the White House complex, he said..."

• That's a capital "T"... The other above-the-fold page one-er in today's Times?

Payment to an Ex-Clinton Aide
Is Linked to Big Chinese Project

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Records Show Hubbell Got Large Fees in 1994

By Jeff Gerth and Stephen Labaton. Batman! Robin!

"In the months after Webster Hubbell was forced to resign to face a criminal investigation in 1994, the former Associate Attorney General received more than $400,000 from about a dozen enterprises, including the organizers of a multibillion-dollar development of the Clinton Administration, according to associates of Mr. Hubbell and to Government records..."

Lots of $$$ that found its way to Webb "came from businesses controlled by old friends and campaign donors" of the Prez, say Jeff & Steve. That's not what caught their collective investigative eye, tho:

"[The] largest payments appear to have come from Hong Kong businesses controlled by the Riady family of Indonesia that have been dealing with the Chinese Government. These businesses are central to a $2 billion American-Chinese project on a ground-breaking trade mission to Beijing in August 1994, two months after Mr. Hubbell was put on the payroll of a Riady family company. Afterward, an Arkansas associate of the Riadys left a message with a friend in the Administration saying the Lippo financial ground, controlled by the Riadys, was 'very happy' with the outcome of the trip.

"A reconstruction from public records and interviews with witnesses, associates and former employers of Mr. Hubbell show that he was paid significantly more money than was previously known, far more in fact than he had earned as a lawyer in Little Rock, Ark., and from a wider variety of sources, many with close ties to Mr. Clinton.

...[The] new details show that [Hubbell's] income was derived from businesses in Hong Kong controlled by the Riadys that have worked closely with the Chinese Government on the huge project in Fujian... "

Since our Prez never seems to know about any of these things until he -- just like us! -- reads 'em in the papers, just imagine his Claude Raines-like shock when he picked up the Times aujourd'hui!