Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (2519)	1/24/2002 1:42:41 AM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11633

You are one incredible bucket of slime aren't you? First of all you try and find a period when their has been a dramatic rise in one of the stocks I have said I shorted. You find NCF went from 10.80 on Sep 25 (shortly after the WTC) to 14.80 on Oct 11. Than you go back through my old posts (what an pathetic life you lead) to see if you can plug my shorting NCF into this period. Well, I did the same. I posted on Sep 11 saying I was short NCF. I actually shorted on Sep 6 at 15.22, Sep 7 at 14.89, covered Sep 10 at 14 and 14.15; shorted again on Sep 17 at 12.95 and Sep 18 at 12.65, covered Sep 19 at 12. ------------- I am not interested in when you say you shorted I am only concerned with the dates you have posted documentation that backs up what you say. So on sep 11 you said you were short NCF. I read from the graphs a price of $12.50 or there abouts. Now you introduce the undocumented additional covers and shorts going forward. Now I am just suppose to take your word for these. Especially given some very interesting peice of information from a later post of yours. And from that post # 2470 """"""""In all seriousness I'll be happy to bet you if you can show me a post where I've said "that you can trade these or short these trusts in just periods of days for superior gains". I'm waiting for either the quote or a retraction."""""""""""""""""""" ------------------ YOUR BUSTED ----------------- I than posted on Oct 2 saying I was out of NCF. --------------- I read from the graph a price of around $13.50 or around there. So that puts your documented loss at about 8% ---------------------- Now you explain jackass why you used Sep 25 as the start date for the period, when I posted on Sep 11 saying I was short? -------------- Thats an easy one check my discussion with gg cox. His post # 2483 was about NCF and the point he was making was about NCF not being able to recover in anything less than many many years. Now my response to him was to illustrate that period in time of sep oct. Which showed a turn around could occur in much less time than he had said in as little as a few weeks. You picked up on that when I made mention to him of your loss on NCF in the period.---------------- Also explain why you used Oct 11 as the close date when I said I was out on Oct 2? --------------- As in the above, it was the reference I had used with gg cox. ---------------------------------------------- The actual dates didn't fit what you wanted to find so you blatantly manipulated the dates. -------------- The actual documented and verified dates of and by the past postings are the only ones that are of concern to me, it is only those that can verified. Not the additional dates you so conveniently added to try to support your case which have no documented evidence whatsoever to back them up. We are just suppose to take your word. I don't expect others to take my word that's why I freely give my past postings which document everything I say. Even if you so choose to ignore them. But ignoring them doesn't make you right it makes you look stupid. And that is why I demand the same from others. No more no less. ---------------------- As far as I'm concerned you now have zero credibility on anything you post. ------------- I provide facts and data to back up what I say. As I do to this post of yours. That the others deem it credible and useful is enough for them and me -------------------------------- And guess what, jackass. From here on I'm your worst nightmare. Anytime you post on this site about anything I'm going to be on you like ugly on an ape. ------------ I welcome the challenge. Although you present none thus far. It has been all to easy with you. Now I await your challege to this. Please dispute what I have responded with. But remember use real facts and real data. OR I WILL BE ON YOU AS I HAVE FROM THE BEGINNING OF YOUR OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS. Of course I still provide you a way out just don't make the claims. NO ONE BELIEVES THEM ANYWAY. ------------- Get used to it. ------------ Your repeated attempts thus far are annoying but I will play along. But I am afraid that by continuing it your apt to piss off many who wish it would just stop. So for the benefit of clarity. Everyone I tried. He just doesn't want to stop ---------------------------------