Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (156690)	1/24/2002 11:36:11 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John - Re: "Why does Dan3 think INTC is locked into fabs that are inefficient vis a vis .13" Blow Hard Dan is a friggin' lunatic. In his mind, Intel is posting losses and AMD is posting profits. His assessment of Intel's fabs and processes is even more halucinogenic. Pay him no mind. Paul

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (156690)	1/24/2002 11:55:50 AM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

JFD- Re: Paul on Dan3 >Blow Hard Dan is a friggin' lunatic. In his mind, Intel is posting losses and AMD is posting profits. >His assessment of Intel's fabs and processes is even more halucinogenic. >Pay him no mind. And at the same time, in Paul's mind, AMD went bankrupt in 1998 and never produced an Athlon over 400 MHz. If you pay Dan no mind, you might as well pay Paul no mind too. Each tends to find small pearls of valid information or patterns that he harps on and exaggerates and repeats ad nauseum (and then some). There are many others like that around here. Usually, it seems, the truth ends up somewhere in the middle of the extremes. -Z