SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (647)1/24/2002 12:55:05 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 3602
 
Ken Lay Quits And Spins

By Dan Ackman
Thursday January 24, 8:50 am Eastern Time
Forbes.com

Kenneth Lay, the longtime chairman and chief executive of bankrupt Enron , quit his post last night. As always, he was thinking about the other guy.

"I want to see Enron survive, and for that to happen we need someone at the helm who can focus 100% of his efforts on reorganizing the company and preserving value for our creditors and hard-working employees," Lay said in a statement released by the company. He added that his decision was made "in cooperation" with the company's creditors.

Enron Special Report: Enron's Endgame To the end, Lay was hard at work himself, spinning. "Unfortunately, with the multiple inquiries and investigations that currently require much of my time, it is becoming increasingly difficult to concentrate fully on what is most important to Enron stakeholders," he said.

Lay is being straightforward--by Enron standards--when he says this. But the reorganization bit is another stretcher. Enron has already sold its trading business, which accounted for more than 90% of its purported $101 billion in revenue. (For why that revenue was largely phony, see"Enron The Incredible.") The price paid initially by UBS Warburg , the Swiss bank, was zero.

The harder assets, such as pipelines and foreign energy plants, may be salable, but it's hard to believe those assets would not be more valuable stripped of the name Enron. Lawyers representing creditors told Forbes.com that while they have not challenged Enron's legal right to present a plan of reorganization, liquidation is the more likely outcome.

Meanwhile, the investigation into the Enron documents shredding is intensifying. A subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold hearings on Capitol Hill today, focusing on actions by Arthur Andersen , Enron's auditor. Subcommittee chairman James Greenwood (R-Pa.) said yesterday that his investigators had determined that up to 80 people had received orders to destroy papers.

Greenwood said that revelation made dubious Andersen's attempts to blame rogue executives for the destruction, some of which continued even after Enron received subpoenas from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

David Duncan, the Andersen accountant who headed the Enron audit and who has been fired by the firm, is scheduled to testify today. But his lawyers have indicated that he will invoke his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself. Duncan has already spoken to the committee in private, but not under oath. The hearings today will be Congress' first public exploration into the collapse of Enron.

Greenwood was incredulous at the idea that Duncan was primarily responsible for the shredding. "Do you believe that 80 Andersen employees were directed by Mr. Duncan to violate an express provision of policy by Andersen in the face of yet another investigation, and none of them picked up the phone and called their superiors and said,

'This doesn't seem right' "? he asked. "The question we need to get to is, Were there instructions from above."

So far, Enron's executives such as Lay, Jeffrey Skilling, his former second in command, and Andrew Fastow, the former chief financial officer fired in October, have benefited from all the attention focused on Andersen, whose executives have been comparatively forthcoming. But the problem with Andersen was that it was working too directly for Enron, rather than fulfilling its duty to the public. (See Accounting For Texans...

forbes.com

In October 2001, Andersen's Duncan wrote a memo warning that Enron's Oct. 16, 2001, press release announcing a $1.2 billion reduction in the company's net worth was itself misleading since it should not have referred to its losses as based on one-time events. The memo also warned of possible action by the SEC.

Congressional investigators who released the memo described it as "internal," and it is not clear who received it. One person who might have benefited from reading was Wendy Gramm, a college professor in Washington, D.C., and the wife of Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas). Wendy Gramm was a member of the Enron's board's Audit Committee.

Yesterday, Sen. Gramm said he and his wife lost nearly $700,000 in deferred compensation when Enron went bankrupt. But prior to the bust, the senator said he and his wife, a former head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, made a point of not discussing business. She has been named as a defendant in shareholder lawsuits.

"My wife and I have had parallel careers ever since we came to Washington,'' he said. "When we go home, we talk about important things like Texas A&M football, me taking out the garbage, those kind of things.''

Now the senator--who was one of the top recipients of Enron's political contributions--has spoken. His wife, the Enron director, is still silent.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (647)1/24/2002 10:35:43 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Respond to of 3602
 
uh oh! Hope we have a volunteer from this reasonable forum who will send some
comments to the reporter. We know who will be responding from the dictator's
forum.....hee haw!



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (647)1/25/2002 6:37:30 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3602
 
Like Enron employees, Lay could lose nearly all

Vast fortune from stocks, bonuses susceptible to lawsuits

By ERIC BERGER
Jan. 24, 2002, 10:13PM
Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle

As the fortunes of Enron soared in the past decade, so did those of Ken Lay.

He netted nearly $145 million through stock sales alone in that 10 years. In just the past five years, he drew $6 million in salary and received more than $20 million in bonuses.

He also may still be able to claim a $60 million severance package.

But much like the vast majority of the company's employees and shareholders, he could now lose nearly everything.

Virtually all income Lay made as chairman and CEO of the once high-flying Enron is susceptible to civil lawsuits filed by employees whose 401(k) retirement accounts have evaporated, shareholders whose holdings are now worthless and creditors holding loans reduced to a fraction of their face value.

Enron officials have not said whether Lay is eligible for the severance package, but even if he were, it will likely wind up in bankruptcy court along with all other Enron debts.

In essence, Lay could become an unsecured creditor like the shareholders and others who are suing him. In the end, even if Lay got the bonus, he could very well lose it in a lawsuit.

For public relations purposes, however, he probably will turn the bonus down, as he did during the failed Dynegy-Enron merger.

Lay's only income not susceptible to creditors is a pension he would draw as part of his retirement from Enron. Qualified money -- including that in 401(k) plans, IRAs and pensions -- are generally protected assets, said Eli Gottesdiener, lawyer for a group of Enron employees whose retirement plans cratered along with Enron's stock.

But even Lay's annual pension of about $400,000 might be caught up in the company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. As Enron tries to form a plan to restructure itself, it has said all pensions might have to be frozen.

Company officials did not return phone calls seeking comment on these issues Thursday.

Most of Lay's compensation was in the form of stock options, many of which allowed him to buy stock at about $20 and sell it at market prices, which peaked at $90 and remained as high as $43 as late as August.

According to data provided by Thomson Financial/First Call going back to 1988, Lay sold 2.4 million shares, mostly options, for a profit of $144.7 million.

Yet in recent years, his direct compensation also increased. In the most recent Securities and Exchange Commission filings on the year 2000, he received two large bonuses in addition to his $1.3 million base pay.

The company's Compensation and Management Development Committee awarded Lay a $7 million bonus to make his compensation compatible with other CEOs of "high-performing companies."

He also received a $3.6 million bonus because of the exceptional growth in the company's stock price compared to its peers from 1997 to 2000.

The company also paid a $250,000 premium on Lay's $10 million life insurance policy.

In 2000, he got options to buy 347,830 shares at three prices of $82, $63 and $47. Because the stock is now virtually worthless -- it closed at 45 cents a share Thursday -- those options will do him no good.

Also of little value are the 106,578 shares he owns of restricted stock, which have no option price but cannot be sold for a set number of years.