Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (221771)	1/24/2002 12:43:58 PM
From: FastC6	Respond to of 769670

Pat, your envy of me is not flattering(....) BTW, we will always be vulnerable, especially if the liberal voice is heard on immigration laws and consequences of terrorist activity....forming a march yet for the prisoner's "rights" in Guantanomo? . .

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (221771)	1/25/2002 2:17:20 AM
From: DOUG H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Are you really this dumb Pat? our spending doesn't assure us protection Like hell, why did the Soviets back down from Keneddy in the 60's? Were they afraid of your peace signs? China wants Formosa back, why don't they take it? Should we have just told the Bosnians, Haitians, Kuwaitis, sorry, we can't afford it. We're funding research into fish fornication and well,,, that's just more important.

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (221771)	1/25/2002 2:41:15 AM
From: DOUG H	Respond to of 769670

The words of William Cohen, Sec of Defense under the biggest sleazebag to enter the White House: "Finally, it is important to note that this projection of the security environment rests on two fundamental assumptions: that the United States will remain politically and militarily engaged in the world over the next 15 to 20 years, and that it will maintain military superiority over current and potential rivals. If the United States were to withdraw from its international commitments, relinquish its diplomatic leadership, or relinquish its military superiority, the world would become an even more dangerous place, and the threats to the United States, our allies, friends, and interests would be even more severe. defenselink.mil