SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stribe30 who wrote (68776)1/24/2002 4:42:22 PM
From: Ali ChenRespond to of 275872
 
"Said an Intel representative: "It looks like you bought into AMD's marketing campaign and started to use 1600+ etc, surely if you're measuring electricals and thermals, you should also use actual Hz rather than marketing speak"

Pretty stupid remark IMO. If the competitive point is
performance and not speed or die size, I do not see
why it is invalid to compare the power consumption
at Quantispeeds.
If Itanic makes the same SPEC numbers at 800MHz as P4-2000,
why do not compare P4 to Itanic consumption at 2000MHz?

- Ali



To: stribe30 who wrote (68776)1/24/2002 6:27:37 PM
From: PetzRespond to of 275872
 
Intel fights back on AMD claims - INQUIRER "buying into" AMD plans

Yea, and Intel would have us believe that it is a good thing that P4's can't operate above ~78degC die temperature.

Petz


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News