SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (156787)1/24/2002 9:44:45 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Again I don't dispute the fact that AMD lost money in Q4. But if they lost money with each chip and where trying to make up for it in volume then they would have lost less if they had sold half as many chips. This is not true even if the ASPs would have been up. Is this a slow enough explanation for you?

I guess I'm slow. Just how do you know it isn't true? I say AMD has terrible yields and they lose money on each low yielding wafer they start. Start fewer wafers, lose less money.

EP



To: TimF who wrote (156787)1/24/2002 10:02:37 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tim,

check this out:
Message 16957515

linuxhardware.org

Funniest thing about the article wasn't the AMD beat the SouthPulp, but the achievement that the SouthPulp finished compiling a kernel without crashing! I do wonder though if they installed the newly compiled kernel and checked if it was operational?

Make it so,
Mysef


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News