SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: A.L. Reagan who wrote (111604)1/25/2002 9:58:09 AM
From: slacker711  Respond to of 152472
 
I'm surprised nobody asked the question why pro-forma revenues were lower than GAAP revenues

They are never going to be the same. GAAP revenues will include interest on loans from carriers and gains on the sale of stock (such as LWIN).

So, the real deal, is Qualcomm earned $.17 cents a share this last quarter, plain and simple.

Maybe...but this means that later in the year (when they expect QSI to be profitable) you would be increasing their earnings pretty dramatically.

When I want to judge the success of Vesper, the three primary numbers I need are ARPU, churn and net subscriber additions. It seems like they did reasonably well on net adds. I wish they had given the ARPU and churn numbers as well.

Slacker



To: A.L. Reagan who wrote (111604)1/25/2002 11:36:02 AM
From: biostruggle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
What happened to Netzerodud? I know they merged with Juno and changed name to United something. Not worthy of mention, must be in other investments in QSI. QSI demonstrates beyond a shadow of doubt qualcomm should get out of the investment business and stick to what they do best.