SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (142136)1/25/2002 11:41:08 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579753
 
TigerPaw,

re:It is the fact that Intel cannot dictate the form of the next machines. They are starting a path where they may have to maintain compatibility with AMD designs.

That's wishful thinking until MSFT creates a 64 bit OS for Hammer.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (142136)1/25/2002 11:59:07 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579753
 
It's not the lead in time that is most important in X86-64 but archetecure. It is the fact that Intel cannot dictate the form of the next machines. They are starting a path where they may have to maintain compatibility with AMD designs.

TP, that's what's so amazing....that Intel may have to defer to the X86-64 architecture. Not that AMD's lead time is something to complain about.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News