Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Middle East Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (647)	1/25/2002 1:29:07 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6945

<< I don't think that Oslo was forced on Israel by the Clinton administration. >> I disagree. The Clinton Administration policy towards Israel was ALWAYS for Israel to make the concessions, and for the Palestinians to get the benefits, thru Clinton's policy of appeasement. This was Clinton's Policy until he left office. Israel, under this continuous Clinton pressure of appeasement, gave in, and accepted the Oslo Accords. When Bush took over, he maintained the Clinton policy of appeasement towards the Palestinians, and pressure on the Israelis. That is, until the Karine-A came along filled with Iranian weapons slated for use against innocent Israelis. Pow! All of a sudden, America has awoken to the insidious threat of Palestinian terrorism, and the real evil of the thought of a Palestinian terrorist State.