Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (156907)	1/25/2002 7:35:20 PM
From: semiconeng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

semiconeng you made a statement, I did not. It is time for to prove your point.... Boy, you fell for that one so easily, I almost hate to do this...... Naaaaaa. YOU quoted Arther Anderson as stating intel as an employer reference, not I. And I was not the one to start the name calling either. I actually typed every combination of Arther Anderson into intel.com website, and Google, attempting to verify YOUR reference, and I just CAN'T FIND any reference to the post that YOU MADE, claiming Arther Anderson worked for intel. I simply stated that Arther Anderson was not intel's auditor, which I PROVED with links. Something you have so far not done with your posting of Arther Anderson claim of intel employment. I don't know how you act on that other thread, but over here, if you make a claim, then YOU have to prove it. I claimed Ernst & Young was intel's Auditors, and I PROVED IT with links. So far, I have been unable to verify YOUR CLAIM of Arther Anderson's intel employment. If you can just show me a reference, because I honestly can't find one, then I will admit that Arther Anderson ONCE worked for intel. So help me out Albert..... I can't find an Arther Anderson reference for intel at their web site or on google. Help me out...... By the way, IF (BIG MOFO IF) intel DID at one time employ AA, they most likely had the standard intel Contract. intel utilizes Contractors that work for a specified time limit. intel has the option to renew the contract if there is additional work, and/or the Contractors performance was satisfactory. In MY experience, intel usually renews the contracts, and there WAS work for an Auditor, So even if Arther Anderson DID once work for intel, it appears that intel..... for whatever reason (mine included) decided not to renew their contract. As you said, "It is time to prove your point". Semi