SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (1214)1/26/2002 12:18:13 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 5185
 
Just another point of view. I wouldn't get too excited
about her comments!

There is plenty wrong though, as you say!



To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (1214)1/26/2002 2:22:42 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5185
 
AND pay less tax
Considering that Enron paid no taxes for the last four years it would seem they could not pay less. The Bush tax cut did have a quarter billion dollar refund in it for Enron, so they went from zero taxes to negative taxes. That's less.
TP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News