Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (69043)	1/26/2002 2:42:26 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 275872

Jim Re...LOL. Intel will probably beat AMD to x86-64 and Intel will end up looking like the innovator...again. Intel PR could see to it...<<<<<<< I doubt if even Russia's pr machine could revise history that much. Intel won't acknowledge 86-64 is a good idea until Both McKinley fails and Hammer takes off. By then it will bo too late for even Intel to change history. AMD is an innovator but for some dumb reason they shun the role...<<<<<<<<< Jerry has never been bashful about bragging. Some people insist upon crediting Intel with everything, including the sun rising in the east. However the passage of time can change everything. It was interesting that on Wall Street Week, the guest, I believe his name was Brandon, a value fund manager, mentioned that he never invests in technology because todays leaders, if they miss one step and fall behind on technology, can be also rans in a hurry, like Lucent. He should have added Intel, because Intel is in danger of missing 2 steps in a row.