SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (767)1/27/2002 9:35:14 PM
From: The Duke of URL©  Respond to of 3602
 
So, Duke, what would you suggest for everyone to look for when selecting companies in which to invest...

Look for companies who your own common sense tells you will have a chance of making a real profit to support an increase in their total market cap.

Enron was a broker, mostly, not a producer. Brokers typically don't make a whole heck of a lot of money, just like Netscapes "Toll Road" or ATT's "data repositories". Ask yourself, if I'm only getting 1% of the deal, and the ease of access makes my possition highly competitive and I have no particular competitive advantage as Buffett would require, just how much could I (or this company) make on this deal???

And if I have to do huge volume for little profit (as a percentage of the deal), there is always a danger that that volume will change.

IF after going through all of this you still like the company, then look to see if all this money is reflected in the income statement.

If it is not taxable income as Enron seems to have claimed then there should be a HUGE pile of cash (not cash equivalents) on the balance sheet.

If not why not.

I could go on. Note that I have NEVER looked at any financial statements from Enron and have NEVER done an analysis of the company.

But no matter how sharp you are, if someone wants to lie, and they are smart enough, you will believe them.

What is going to be interesting is to find out why some of these "Big Hitter" investors got popped. Maybe they don't know so much or maybe they were too lazy or maybe they just can't read a balance sheet as well as an attorney who has tax and accounting training.

I don't have a clue.



To: KLP who wrote (767)1/28/2002 6:15:40 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 3602
 
Texas Law Firm Has Ties to Enron

Big, Politically Connected Texas Law Firm Has Forged Close Ties With Enron

By DAVID KOENIG
AP Business Writer
Sunday January 27, 1:12 pm Eastern Time

HOUSTON (AP) -- Vinson & Elkins' reputation took 80 years to polish and one client to smudge.

The largest law firm in Houston and the most profitable in Texas, Vinson & Elkins has been stung by accusations it showed poor judgment -- or worse -- in work for Enron Corp. (NYSE:ENE - news)


An Enron insider claims Vinson & Elkins blessed partnership deals that hid the energy trading company's shaky financial situation until it collapsed into bankruptcy.

Outside lawyers say the firm violated ethical standards by reviewing the accusations itself instead of demanding an impartial, outside review.

V&E has worked for Enron since the energy company's founding in the mid-1980s and Enron is now its biggest client, accounting for $35 million of its $450 million in billings last year.

Vinson & Elkins' work for Enron might not have attracted much attention but for an Enron executive's letter written in August to chairman Kenneth Lay.

The executive, Sherron Watkins, fretted that Enron could ``implode in a wave of accounting scandals,'' and urged the company to hire a law firm to investigate murky accounting and partnership deals that helped keep billions in debt off Enron's books.

``Can't use V&E due to conflict -- they provided some true sale opinions on some of the deals,'' Watkins wrote. Lawyers write true sale opinions on the legality of transactions.

Enron ignored Watkins' plea and turned back to Vinson & Elkins. In October, V&E partner Max Hendrick III wrote to Enron's general counsel James Derrick Jr., a former V&E partner, that Watkins' charges could prove embarrassing but merited no further investigation.

Lawyers who specialize in suing other lawyers say Vinson & Elkins left itself open to attack by angry shareholders and ex-employees by not insisting that another firm be hired to investigate Watkins' claims.

``When you've got someone asking you to review your own conduct, there's a bias,'' said Sean Jez, who represents shareholders suing Enron officers and directors.

A legal malpractice specialist, Valorie Davenport, said big law firms fight over clients Enron's size and tend to gloss over problems to get and keep that business.

Vinson & Elkins won't say what role it played in approving the controversial Enron partnerships.

Watkins, the Enron executive who raised the accusation against the law firm, doesn't have documentary proof but ``reliable sources communicated to her that the work was done,'' said her lawyer, Philip Hilder.

A spokesman for Vinson & Elkins, Joe Householder, said the firm couldn't discuss its work for Enron because it still represents the company.

``We are fully confident that everything we've done for Enron is to the highest professional and ethical standards,'' he said.

Founded in 1917, the firm specialized in working with banks to provide legal advice and financing to Texas' then-young oil industry, and it grew rapidly as the energy sector boomed.

``They did very good work, much of it humdrum work, like checking land titles. Attention to detail,'' said Harold Hyman, a retired Rice University history professor who wrote a book about the firm.

Vinson & Elkins partners, who once included former Texas Gov. John Connally, grew rich.

But the firm also developed a progressive reputation for doing pro bono work on civil-liberties cases and for hiring female, black and Jewish partners in the 1970s, before many other Texas law firms did.

The law firm has forged close ties with many Texas politicians, especially President Bush.

Two of its partners and a third who recently left were among the ``pioneers'' who raised at least $100,000 for Bush's presidential campaign. White House counsel Alberto Gonzalez -- sometimes mentioned as a possible Bush nominee to the Supreme Court -- is a former Vinson & Elkins attorney.

On the Net:

V&E: vinson-elkins.com
____________________________

More info. on Enron's Outside Legal Cousel...

vinson-elkins.com

With more than 860 lawyers and some 3,800 clients, Vinson & Elkins is among the world's major law firms. Since its founding, the Firm has attracted an outstanding and diverse group of attorneys as well as a strong, varied client base.

The Firm’s clients include the governments of sovereign nations and North American states, as well as cities and municipalities, public and private companies from around the world, domestic and international financial institutions, entrepreneurial enterprises and individuals.

In list after list and survey after survey, Vinson & Elkins consistently ranks as one of the leading law firms of the world. For more details about our standing in the legal community:

vinson-elkins.com