SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Gryba who wrote (157132)1/28/2002 1:18:51 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Respond to of 186894
 
Constantine, Re: "did u think that they may be comparing it to a 200Mhz Tbird? The desktop pally is probably rated against a 266Mhz Tbird."

AMD model numbers are compared against the Pentium 4. I don't care if they try to deny it. There is no way that their model numbers can continue to match either core, however, since they continue to increase at a rate of 100 for every 66MHz of performance. But some of you guys will continue to deny that there are any problems, even though they are sitting right in front of your face.

wbmw



To: Charles Gryba who wrote (157132)1/28/2002 2:18:44 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Constantine, <did u think that they may be comparing it to a 200Mhz Tbird?>

I think if Intel's "two-drink minimum" marketing were anything like AMD's "down the whole keg" marketing, you'd see Northwood model numbers being compared to Willamette on PC133 SDRAM.

Tenchusatsu

P.S. - T-bird is NOT the reference point for AMD's "QuantiSpeed." This is a weak defense thrown up by AMDroids in defense of a weak marketing campaign.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News