Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mitch Blevins who wrote (9856)	1/28/2002 1:42:37 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 28931

It must be a forged image, just as most of "Paul's" writings were forged under his name... Is there a signature of authentication on the tree's image of Jesus? home.inu.net Click on attachment 111 at end of article "are the gospels true".

To: Mitch Blevins who wrote (9856)	1/28/2002 1:53:56 PM
From: James Calladine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"then how do you explain this?" Not all that difficult to do. Sight is a CREATIVE process, and not any kind of absolute perception that is the same to everybody. This is readily demonstrated in hypnotism when people "see" whatever it is suggested they see. What people see is conditioned by their expectation and belief. Thus, some people will experience this sight as "Jesus", other people as nothing at all, or a tree, bark, whatever. A devout Muslim might experience the same sight as a vision of Mohammed! But maybe culturally the inclination of such people would be to see Mohammed in clouds or at oases. Namaste! Jim