Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rollcast... who wrote (222923)	1/28/2002 5:50:53 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Bad news for Dems: "Soccer moms" wise up and get serious: More Women Rank Defense As Priority Sat Jan 26, 2:33 AM ET By EUN-KYUNG KIM, Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON - In a stark reversal since the Sept. 11 attacks, women are now more likely than men to consider national defense a top priority, according to a new poll. "Too many things are happening. We have let our guard down; we need to beef things up," said Carol Drummonds, a 52-year-old paralegal in Birmingham, Ala. "I always felt like we were prepared. I'm second-guessing now that maybe we're not." More women than men — 57 percent to 46 percent — named bolstering national security as a top priority, according to a poll released this week by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. Last year, a poll showed only 42 percent of women were as worried about national defense, compared with 53 percent of men. "It's due entirely to the events of September 11," said Paul Herrnson, director of the University of Maryland's Center for American Politics and Citizenship. Men traditionally tend to be more hawkish on national defense and more likely than women to give it higher priority, Herrnson said. Since the terror attacks, however, women are less likely to see defense as a question of armaments or going to war. "It's now become an issue that deals with the safety of their home places. It's a response to homeland security issues at a personal, my-family-security level," he said. "It has brought the issue down to a very basic personal level." The attacks appear to have heightened protective instincts in women, who traditionally have given a higher rating to education, health care and poverty than men when listing domestic priorities. "We have our kids to protect — not just for my son, other children, other people and their children," said Rachel Buy, a 26-year-old mother in Garden Grove, Calif. "We don't need to be scared going outside our house," she said. "If we go to any type of city like Washington ..., if I want to take my son to the White House, I don't want to be scared, don't want to be afraid." Recent polls have reflected rising worries among women about national defense. A poll released in November found that women, who traditionally are more skeptical about increased military spending, were nearly as likely as men to favor more money for U.S. forces. Drummonds, the Alabama paralegal, said "it's just natural" for women to be bothered more about the state of national defense. "We're looking at our sons and husbands and fathers getting more involved in the military," she said. The Pew poll of 1,201 adults was taken Jan. 9-13 and has an error margin of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. story.news.yahoo.com

To: Rollcast... who wrote (222923)	1/28/2002 5:53:03 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Well! The #@### Democrats are up to their old tricks...spend spend spend. When will they wise up and get with the Republicans. Wait a minute! Bush hasn't changed parties, has he? "January 28, 2002 NEWS ANALYSIS In a Sign of Changing Times, Bush Calls for More Spending By RICHARD W. STEVENSON ASHINGTON, Jan. 27 — The budget that President Bush will send to Congress a week from Monday strays far from the agenda of small government and fiscal conservatism that the administration advocated on taking office a year ago. It will propose a spending increase of around 9 percent for next year, more than any big-government Democrat would dare to put on the table. It will cast aside all the promises about maintaining budget surpluses and paying down the national debt that both parties made in recent years, and instead will project at least several years of budget deficits