SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: StanX Long who wrote (59568)1/29/2002 1:39:24 AM
From: StanX Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
I received this today from TD Waterhouse.

Interesting.

Stan

Market Insight for January 28, 2002

Selective Buying Advised
By Arnie Kaufman, Editor, The Outlook

The market trend we see will be jagged, but basically upward.
No one seems to be in a hurry to put money to work in the market. Stocks are hardly screaming buys. Despite the deep bear market of 2000-2001, P/Es are relatively high. But a recovery from the recession should soon take root and help justify today's valuations. While the averages may stay in a trading range in the near term, we expect gradual improvement in the economy and in investor psychology to lead to modest stock gains for the year.

The news lately has been more upbeat. So far, most fourth-quarter 2001 profit reports are matching or slightly exceeding recently lowered expectations, and companies generally are a touch more optimistic regarding the future. After a long and steep decline, our analysts' earnings estimates have been flattening out (see chart on page 1 of this week's edition of The Outlook).

Hopes for additional fiscal stimulus were revived last week. While we don't believe a package out of Congress is necessary to get the economy growing again, it would serve as insurance against any disappointments, such as a possible business letdown once the impact on manufacturers of the re-stocking of inventories starts to wane.

Profit margin pressures are a concern. Pricing power of U.S. corporations remains weak, owing to excess capacity and tough competition (partly because of the strong dollar, a major advantage for foreign producers). Security spending, insurance premiums and labor costs are up.

At the same time, though, controlling expenses is an even greater priority than in the past. With continuing technological advances, productivity should remain high. And it would seem that, through heavy write-offs, the decks are being well cleared for improved corporate performance.

Investors generally are holding considerable cash reserves, so it won't take too much in the way of improved confidence for stocks to extend their post-September 21 gains. A policy of selective accumulation remains in order.



To: StanX Long who wrote (59568)1/29/2002 3:14:31 AM
From: Sam Citron  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
Anyone who watched analyst Dan Scotto's interview with Consuelo Mack on CNBC this evening will never again listen to Wall Street sell side research without questioning its fundamental integrity. Dan was a top utility analyst who was fired from BNP Paribas a few months after writing a negative report on Enron. Now that he has decided never to return to Wall Street, he tells the dirty secrets of how analysts have to tone down their criticism of companies, or simply say nothing negative, due to their firms' incestuous investment banking relations with the companies they cover.



To: StanX Long who wrote (59568)1/29/2002 7:55:48 PM
From: advocatedevil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
"Chip Gearmakers Shouldn't Fear the Capex Grim Reaper"

thestreet.com

By Tish Williams Senior Writer 01/29/2002 11:14 AM EST

The party for chip equipment companies died in 2001. After semiconductor makers spent like drunken sailors on equipment the previous year, 2001 brought sobered-up capital markets, skidding economies and massive scaling back in expenditures for chip equipment.

In the past few weeks, the chip companies with the largest capital expenditure budgets have announced even more cutbacks for 2002. The biggest of them all, Intel (INTC:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis), held firm in 2001, but as 2002 opened it lopped 22% off its budget for the new year, a harbinger of cuts across the chip sector.

That means billions of dollars in capital expenditures that aren't going to chip equipment companies. While chip investors must decide if they like the industry as much as they did during free-spending 2000, there are reasons to challenge the assumption that investors have a year of hibernation ahead of them.

First off, 2002's numbers aren't a swig of instant death for the equipment companies. The most free-spending chipmakers out there are cutting their budgets from 25% (as in Intel) to as much as 62% (from Infineon (IFX:NYSE ADR - news - commentary - research - analysis)). While Infineon's drop from $2 billion to $800 million is dramatic, remember that chip leaders have been cutting back for several quarters. This means equipment companies already saw depressed spending levels as 2001 progressed.

For example, Texas Instruments (TXN:NYSE - news - commentary - research - analysis) reported results Monday after the bell and reduced its capital expenditure budget to $800 million from a $1.8 billion outlay in 2001. Equipment makers have been feeling the pain all year, though, because TI spent over $900 million in the first quarter, followed by a sequential Scrooge-like decline to $342 million in the second quarter, $312 million in the third quarter and $236 million in the fourth. Going from $236 million in the fourth quarter, $800 million for the full year is not as startling as it may seem.

"At $800 million, our capex level would be pretty flat on a quarter-to-quarter basis," said Texas Instruments CFO Bill Aylesworth.

Incredible Shrinking Capex

Chip companies plan to pony up even less than last year for capital expenditures.

Company_______2000_______2001_______2002 Est.___Decrease

Intel________$6.67 billion__$7.3 billion__$5.5 billion___-22%
Samsung______$3.1 billion___$3.2 billion__$2.29 billion__-28%
TSMC________$5 billion_____$2.2 billion__$1.65 billion__-25%
Texas Instr____$2.76 billion__$1.8 billion__$800__million__-55%
ST Micro_____$3.3 billion___$1.7 billion__$1.2 billion____-29%
Infineon______$1.65 billion__$2.08 billion__$796 million__-62%

Source: Company statements

Another potential shift is that as chipmakers retrench, they will spend less on building new manufacturing locales and more on the equipment that goes into them. Intel noted in its fourth-quarter conference call that while its budget is going down $1.8 billion, it will spend about 50% on equipment, with 33% on construction, making its actual equipment spending drop less than $1 billion.

Money Will Follow New Processes

Texas Instruments goes even further as Aylesworth insists that of TI's more modest budget, "a very high percentage will go toward equipment targeted in advanced areas." He says TI's facilities in Dallas and around the globe will fill its needs in 2002, giving it room to spend its $800 million on 0.13 micron, 300 millimeter wafer and copper interconnect equipment.

Though it's not a huge surprise, investors may want to follow Aylesworth's comments and look into companies with the latest and greatest equipment. Granddady of them all Applied Materials (AMAT:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) and smaller rival Novellus (NVLS:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) excel in those areas, as does Brooks Automation, (BRKS:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis), which outfits the more highly mechanical operations of sophisticated technologies.

"The world's swimming in 0.25 micron capacity," said Morgan Stanley's Steven Pelayo, explaining the low utilization rates investors have seen chip companies report. "But 0.18 micron and below is very tight, including 0.13 and 0.15. It's probably running at 80%- to 90%-plus rates. If a chipmaker is still making investments it's at the leading edge, which will be the mainstream of the next cycle." That will benefit chip equipment companies with a technology advantage -- those selling for the 300-micron processes, for example.

Spending budgets also tend to change over time. Take technology giant Samsung, which finished 2001 having doled out on 31% of its original capex plan. Samsung's projections changed several times during the year, falling each quarter to reflect demand. Budgets could go up the same way if the much-anticipated second-half recovery in PCs and mobile phones materializes. As Micron (MU:NYSE - news - commentary - research - analysis) spokesman Sean Mahoney illustrated, Micron spent $1.7 billion on manufacturing in 2001, but as the year progresses, its 2002 estimated expenditures of $1 billion are truly estimates that "could be adjusted as business dictates," he says.

What remains for the investor to consider is whether an equipment stock looks as interesting when capex no longer matches the jaw-dropping levels of 2000 or even 2001. Inevitably the chip cycle will run its course and spending will rise again. But as Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown's Timothy Arcuri argues, "If you're going to look at what happened in 2000, that was arguably a perfect storm on the upside. But that was a very different financing environment than today. Access to capital is much different," he says.

"A lot of companies were spending on equipment that's still sitting in warehouses," according to Arcuri. Investors have to prepare themselves for a future uptick that is strong, but compared to 2000, "relatively speaking might not be that great," he says.

Considering that, the run-up in chip equipment stocks seems too optimistic, even given their traditional role in leading the upward cycle. Applied Materials gained 47% from Oct. 1 to the end of the year, while Novellus rose 51%, KLA-Tencor shares added 70%, ASM Lithography (ASML:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) climbed 63% and PRI Automation (PRIA:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) rocketed up 144%. Even the recent earnings news and the capex revisions contained in them haven't rocked the stocks, which are at or above where they ended the year.

AdvocateDevil