Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (42904)	1/29/2002 5:41:31 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 82486

If it was isolated, I suppose one could try to guess at some relevance to...something... But this scenario has gone on through Poet, E, X, YYB, and perhaps many I have no awareness of. There is always the claim of an intimacy to an extent that is denied by the others. I am not going to guess at what he is motivated by. I say little about Edwarda because I know little. I did not know her. I can infer that she somewhat polarized people; and it seems clear that she is very well remembered by many. I hope she rests in peace. It does not seem right that anyone should be used as an extra forward to personal hostilities of the living...whether they did or did not get along with her. If CH wished to speak to facts about things, then he would have no need to insinuate that which is either false or unwelcome. Privacy is important, and privacy should take precedence over personal hostilities or grudges. Anyway, it has been very unpleasant. I am going out for awhile.

To: one_less who wrote (42904)	1/29/2002 8:15:59 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

<<trying to give BIA's defenders some of her medicine>> LOL. An interesting theory. Which highlights two aspects regarding this poster's ... uh, 'catfood material' ROFL. Said "Mr." Hodgkins doesn't have the catfood material to address me directly... which compels him to, as you say, 'go after' similar women. That would be those of us who don't buy 'shaming manipulation' in real life or Cyberspace by angry white male thugs. Mr. Hodgkins is not directly addressing me, because he can't. LMAO. Because he knows I have the PMs he sent me that I didn't respond to. Will also remind the 'readers' here that this poster made public that he threatened SI itself with potential lawsuits re TOU violations, etc. Because I was one of his most recent 'targets' -- as well as the inanity of his PMs to me looking for some sex on the Internet -- LOL!! -- I was aware of his little MO. Send 'em PMs and then stalk them publicly. All I can imagine is that he gets off on -- likely sexually -- intimidation of women. bia