Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (223701)	1/30/2002 3:07:18 PM
From: calgal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Jules Witcover White House task force secrecy newsandopinion.com -- IN the emerging Enron scandal, the White House has made itself a target by asserting executive privilege to shield the inner workings of Vice President Dick Cheney's policy task force that last year shaped President Bush's energy policy. But there is plenty of precedent for doing so. Through the years, White House privacy claims for secret meetings and conversations have been invoked by Republicans and Democrats alike in fending off prying eyes and ears. Administrations of both parties have justified business done in private as imperative to assure that presidents and their chief subordinates receive candid counsel from those called to advise them. What sets apart the current attempt to protect the privacy of Cheney's task force is that the folks seeking access are not of the same cloth as the probing Democrats of the Watergate scandal or the Republicans hot on the trail of Bill and Hillary Clinton in the Whitewater affair that wound up being a washout. The snoop demanding access to the whisperings in the Cheney energy speakeasy is the General Accounting Office, the bipartisan and generally esteemed creature of Congress. After more Cheney stonewalling on last Sunday's television talk shows, GAO director David Walker has said he intends to take the Bush administration to court - the first time such a drastic step has ever been taken by the agency. Coming in the midst of the multiple Enron investigations in Congress, which inevitably will have partisan colorations, the nonpartisan GAO quest just as inevitably raises suspicions that the Bush administration has something to hide about what Enron representatives said to Cheney and aides then formulating the nation's energy policy. The invoking of the privilege is in itself nothing unusual. Long before Richard Nixon resorted to it in his eventually futile effort to cover up the Watergate scandal, other presidents and aides were using it, and afterward as well. Less than a decade ago, the Clinton administration effectively resisted efforts to open secret task force meetings by First Lady Hillary Clinton at which her husband's health care proposal was crafted. In that case, health care professional and consumer groups sought to let the light of day in by arguing in court that since Mrs. Clinton was not a government official, only the wife of one, executive privilege could not be used to keep her task force doings in the dark. The pertinent law stipulated that any meeting involving any non-government people had to be open. The Association of American Surgeons and Physicians and health-care consumer groups complained that health maintenance organizations and insurance companies were involved in making health-care policy in the task force, just as energy consumers now allege that giant energy corporations like Enron had their heads in Cheney's task force tent. In the Clinton task force case, lawyers for the administration argued that the health care plan was devised by "an amorphous horde" of more than 500 people operating in "creative confusion" and therefore was not a formal advisory committee under obligation to release its working papers or records. The comment inspired a lawyer for the petitioners to respond: "This was not some amorphous horde. Ant colonies and bee colonies sometimes look like a horde, too. But they follow a system. They follow their queen. Here it is absolutely no different." Over the next two years, the courts ruled for and against the petitioners a couple of times, and in 1998 a judge ordered the Clinton administration, Mrs. Clinton, and Ira Magaziner, an aide who oversaw the task force, to pay nearly $286,000 in medical and legal fees, but that finding too was thrown out. If President Bush had had the benefit of hindsight, he might have been wise follow Bill Clinton's example and put his wife, Laura, who apparently has no aspirations to be a government official, in charge of the energy task force. But he didn't, and so Cheney as the man in the hot seat has no easy dodge. Defenders of the president in the Enron matter have been able to cite his subordinates' refusal to help the Houston firm when approached, and to dismiss the case as a corporate, not a political, problem. But if his administration through Cheney continues to stonewall the non-political GAO, he is likely to find it otherwise. newsandopinion.com