Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (1904)	1/30/2002 8:10:59 PM
From: Mephisto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5185

Mark, I haven't read the entire report but the professor's comments are well written and scare me because although I never invested in Enron, I have other investments.- Mephisto "Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the three major credit rating agencies - Moody's, Standard & Poor's, and Fitch/IBCA - received substantial, but as yet undisclosed, fees from Enron. Yet just weeks prior to Enron's bankruptcy filing - after most of the negative news was out and Enron's stock was trading at just $3 per share - all three agencies still gave investment grade ratings to Enron's debt. The credit rating agencies in particular have benefited greatly from a web of legal rules that essentially require securities issuers to obtain ratings from them (and them only), and at the same time protect those agencies from outside competition and liability under the securities laws. They are at least partially to blame for the Enron mess. An investment-grade credit rating was necessary to make Enron's special purpose entities work, and Enron lived on the cusp of investment grade. During 2001, it was rated just above the lowest investment-grade ratio."