SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (69890)2/1/2002 8:53:54 AM
From: Dan3Respond to of 275872
 
Re: one of the analysts seemed convinced that a major reason UMC wanted the deal was because AMD's 0.13 SOI process is superior to IBM's

That would be quite something, if true. It would make AMD the undisputed world leader in production process technology.

That's how Intel got to where it is today, back when it's technology wasn't just "whatever AMD went to 2 years ago."



To: Petz who wrote (69890)2/1/2002 10:08:15 AM
From: dale_laroyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
>On the contrary, one of the analysts seemed convinced that a major reason UMC wanted the deal was because AMD's 0.13 SOI process is superior to IBM's.<

Superior in what way? If IBM's process yields faster switching and/or lower power consumption, AMD's could still be superior to IBM's for UMC's purposes if it was lower cost and/or higher yield.



To: Petz who wrote (69890)2/1/2002 2:02:53 PM
From: Monica DetwilerRespond to of 275872
 
John - You responded one of the analysts seemed convinced that a major reason UMC wanted the deal was because AMD's 0.13 SOI process is superior to IBM's.

How would UMC have verifiable knowledge of this - since AMD has yet to produce saleable parts on their SOI process, and IBM has produced saleable devices?
Monica