Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (2103)	2/1/2002 1:46:50 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5185

I look at Enron's spreading of its influential dough as a matter of Democrats getting some money only 'cause America saw two terms of a Democratic Administration and I suspect that most of the Dems who got Enron bucks pulled it in because they were on committees important to Enron, plus a few bones here and there. It seems clear, however, that Enron's primary goal was to get as many Republicans elected as possible, and especially grab the presidency. It did! A pox on ANY house that is guilty of graft and corruption. But I think you will find that a lot of this stuff started to boil when the Republican's controlled the Senate, with their secret legislative meetings that they would not even let the Democratic Senators attend, and the fact that Clinton who could have effectively vetoed a lot of this stuff was neutralized by the bl*wjb incident and was being threatened with criminal prosecution by that very same Senate. That is why the Constitution of the United States does not define sex as a high crime or misdemeanor. And anyone who fell for that argument is either a dummy, a robot, a clone or has a sinister agenda. The danger of a massive debacle like ENRON, is simply more important to the survival of our country than a President's dalliance. I'll stop now. What's up with this Baker thingy??