Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WTMHouston who wrote (2448)	2/2/2002 12:51:37 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

WTM, I'm astounded at the temerity of these people. Public posting of heinously public documents, for example: "Mr. Doe IV has posted numerous postings attacking Mr. Dobry, including posting public documents regarding this case, a specific violation of the Protective Order." Message 16997766 Surely any documents covered under the protective order would be "non-public" since they're — under "The Order". Those darned public ones are a real consternation, though. I mean, the public might see those public docs. In public, even! This guy Richter really has a home-run case. I hope he hangs that nefarious poster of public docs which are public that he posted to the public, publically, without pubic-reference, in public, on a public message board with publically-posted public documents posted in public. Any suggestions, strictly from your "public observer" point-of-view?