Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (43149)	2/3/2002 11:13:39 AM
From: Neenny	Respond to of 82486

B-I-A, In my post, I left open the option that CH, was doing what was accused of him. Yet personally I will believe him over his accusers. Please provide proof. He has given you public permission to post any such messages. Show us what you have. The following gives credence to my doubting what you have to say. I have seen some of the false and rude accusations you have made on a deceased woman. I also know of the relationship between CH and Edwarda. What I don't understand is why so many "women" take issue what her relationship with any of her "male" friends was. As it really is none of their business. It would only have been their business if it directly impacted the woman's real life. As for her real life, She made no secret of the things in her life, and admittedly said that not everyone might agree with them. Had those people who want to judge her, took the time to really know her heart, instead of appearing at the times to be bitter, jealous, scorned women, they might have known who the "real" Edwarda was. Trust me, she was as real online as she was in 3-D. I just think if one had talked to her in private or 3-D there was the opportunity to know more of the heart behind the woman that posted publicly. From what I can tell, she spared no honesty in even revealing her faults. YEP, we all have them!!! But the incredibly kind, caring, and thoughtful person she was, also came through with flying colors. I dearly miss the phone conversations she and I would have several times a week. With her passing the kindness, intelligence and compassion that she took with her, has yet to be filled by a single person. I have many friends online and in 3-D, each, who with their individual differences, have made for a real blessing in my life. I did lose one of those blessings when Edwarda passed away. In my heart I will always feel blessed to have her to call my "friend" Now, would you PLEASE refrain from judging someone you had admittedly never known. It seems you have listened to the few that for whatever reason did not like or respect Edwarda, but I feel you need to give equal consideration to what those that really knew her have to say. I agree totally with Mrs. Peel's post awhile back that Edwarda would have found something nice and likable about you, in spite of your unfairly judging her. She would have respected that fact that you were entitled to your own opinion. Maybe that is what you should come up with......your own opinion of her. I realize that is impossible for you to do, being that she is no longer with us, for you to learn who she was, and what made her tick on a first hand basis. You might have found her actually likable, as so many of us did. But being that she is gone from us, maybe so should your comments and accusations about her be gone as well. Jane

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (43149)	2/4/2002 1:18:56 AM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 82486

Perhaps I should 'check with' Uncle SI Admin before I post them here. Do that. I have. If the sender did not request that the PM be kept private or if it does not contain private information (such as the senders real name, if not already known, or their phone number, address, or bank acct info) you can post it. Ask Admin Jeff, I did. Put up or shut up.