Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Webster Groves who wrote (17922)	2/3/2002 12:02:03 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

No, you're missing the point. It has little or nothing to do with fashion accessories. If you met a person who knew little or nothing about physics other than what he learned in high school, I trust you'd think he was ignorant, whether or not it was his own fault. It may or may not be a reflection on his character, but as a matter of fact, you can't learn everything there is to know about physics in high school. I don't care whether a person is a genius or not, there is no way to learn all there is to know about constitutional law in high school, or even undergraduate school, or even law school. If someone stand on their hind legs and loudly spouts an opinion, either he/she knows what he/she is talking about, or he/she does not. Since you obviously did not know what you were talking about vis-a-vis separation of powers, there were two possibilities - either you were very young, or you did not have sufficient knowledge. You have clarified that you are not very young, and therefore I am forced to conclude that you do not have sufficient knowledge. I was wondering whether you were just trained in a discipline which did not provide sufficient knowledge, or were ignorant for reasons which had nothing to do with your training, and am forced to conclude that your ignorance is willful. I'm done with you. Have a nice day.