SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. T. who wrote (224639)2/3/2002 2:15:59 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Dearest et. I love it, you kinda know the answer. " I know... he is not hiding any thing because he is completely within his rights not to disclose what he, as a government official, says to a business executive in private. right.

But what is so funny..
dear e.t. you say "ET says Enron execs were close advisers to Bush on
shaping energy policy. I wonder who stood to benefit the most, the American
people or execs at Enron."

I am very happy that ET and all dems say and think these things. The reality
which good and honest men will see is this. Real men who are good and
honest can read the Energy Report that is the work product of all the meetings
and contacts with ENE.

The report is hundreds of pages of analysis and recommendation. All the
idiot's men and even their horses asses cannot find a smoking gun, an
inference, a hint of collusion. duhhhhhhh. That is very interesting.

In that report all will find that 11 out 12 proposals of Environmental groups are
included. One will not find support for kyoto and co2 limits that would be
directly in the interest of ENE that is into trading energy and the proposed co2
credits kyoto con game.

et. please continue to spout and spread your nonsense. Politically attempting
to tell the folks that PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH is dishonest is really a
dumb ass thing to do. Be my guest fool.

I just wonder if PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH spent enough money to get
good messages out to the folks today during the Super Bowl. Only 2 million, it
should have been 20. LOL

tom watson tosiwmee



To: E. T. who wrote (224639)2/3/2002 2:16:18 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
This cracks me up, Hillary Clinton wouldn't even disclose who attended her Health Care task force meetings, when she wanted to take over 17% of the economy and put it under government control. And Democrats didn't balk-one-bit.

Now they are up in arms because Cheney refuses to disclose the exact words of a private conversation and they are crying foul, coverup, etc. etc.

The hypocrisy astounds me. And I've seen some hypocritical liberal positions in my life!

Maybe we should just hook-up internet video phones in every room of the White House for the next 7 years. Would that satisfy privacy invading liberals?



To: E. T. who wrote (224639)2/3/2002 4:40:51 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
As soon as Daschle, Gephardt, and that guy from CA with the garlic bulb for a nose -- Waxman -- disclose the sum and substance of every meeting they've had with lobbyists, liberal special interest groups, constituents, supporters, and other government officials, they might be within their moral right -- if not legal right -- to demand the same of Cheney.

But you can rest assured that they won't even consider it.