Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mephisto who wrote (2577)	2/4/2002 10:07:44 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15516

Those ads were real stinkers. They might have worked if compared to late night infomercials, but they looked cheap and unfocused next to the best of Madison Avenue. I think there can be no doubt their real purpose was to send government money to Murdoch. TP

To: Mephisto who wrote (2577)	2/4/2002 1:06:29 PM
From: Mephisto	Respond to of 15516

delete

To: Mephisto who wrote (2577)	2/4/2002 10:30:58 PM
From: Mephisto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15516

This Drug Ad a Hard Sell February 3, 2002 It's not all corporate pitchmen at this year's Super (Ad) Bowl. Joining Anheuser-Busch, Pepsi and tonight's other big-budget image buffers is one advertiser with a truly tarnished brand: White House drug czar John Walters, desperate to add some luster to the government's discredited war on drugs. Sorry, John. That'll take more than TV commercials, even during the Super Bowl. But Walters is a hard-nosed protege of tough-talking drug warrior Bill Bennett. Since being confirmed by the Senate in December, Walters has been an eager captive of the old-school lock-'em-up approach, emphasizing pointless police busts and endless prison terms instead of proven drug treatment. And now he's at it again, with a preposterous new message and plenty of money to burn. Our money, of course. Three-and-a-half million dollars' worth. It's the highest single-event advertising buy the federal government has ever made. And look what all that money will buy: Two 30-second spots on the highest-priced TV platform of the year. The ads advance the cynical claim that nonviolent Americans who use drugs are financing international terrorism. "That's like blaming beer drinkers in the '20s for Al Capone," said Matt Briggs of Manhattan's reform-minded Drug Policy Alliance: "It's not the product - it's the prohibition that brings the criminals in." Officials in Washington were refusing to allow an advance look at the commercials. So it's impossible to pick apart the language until tonight. But the underlying argument can be refuted easily enough. There's no denying that profits from the illegal drug trade have found their way into the hands of terrorists. To cite just one fresh example: Opium, the precursor to heroin, was a major cash crop in Afghanistan during the rule of the Taliban, generous patron to al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden. But that doesn't mean we can blame 9/11 on some kid smoking a joint in the basement of his parents' home. That's the leap where the drugs-equal-terror argument falls apart. It's not the drugs themselves that produce the huge illicit profits. It's the fact that the drugs are against the law. Change those laws and - snap! Just like that! - those profits will disappear. You want to blame someone for the drug-terror ties? Blame the politicians who refuse to change America's expensive and counter-productive drug laws. As Briggs points out: "Legal drugs like Xanax and Prozac don't create profits that end up in the hands of people like Osama bin Laden. You make a product illegal and the worst people in the world will gravitate to the trade. It's not normal businesspeople anymore." It wasn't by accident that Briggs mentioned Xanax. The popular anti-anxiety drug, available with a doctor's prescription, makes an appearance in the other big drug story of the week. It's the tale of 24-year-old Noelle Bush, the president's niece and the only daughter of Fla. Gov. Jeb Bush. It's a sad story, a story millions of American families can relate to: a young woman with a drug problem, getting picked up by police. Noelle Bush was arrested Tuesday night at the drive-in window of an all-night drugstore in Tallahassee, trying to scam her way into some Xanax. She'd phoned in the prescription herself, pretending to be a physician. The druggist got a funny feeling and telephoned police. She was promptly cuffed and taken off to jail - before being released to her parents. Her father and mother put out a statement from the governor's mansion, calling the incident "serious." They asked "the public and the media to respect our family's privacy during this difficult time so that we can help our daughter." And don't they have the right? Did it really matter that the child in question was the daughter of the governor, the niece of the president of the United States? Well, in one way, it did. The governor was asking that his kid be treated in a way that he has staunchly refused to treat other people's children, and that's just not right. During his three years in office, Jeb Bush has packed Florida prisons with nonviolent drug offenders, some not so different from his daughter. He has cut drug treatment and special drug courts. Lately, he's been attacking a drug-reform ballot initiative that will go to Florida voters in November. It calls for treatment - not jail - for an estimated 10,000 nonviolent Florida drug defendants a year. A super idea, actually - that won't get any advertising boost at the Super Bowl. Email: henican@newsday.com Copyright © 2002, Newsday, Inc. newsday.com