Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (10095)	2/4/2002 8:16:19 AM
From: Bill Fischofer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Time is relative. Space is relative. To what???? To all that is infinite and pure and prime and perfect which is all that is ONE (1) where everything in creation proceeds forth from. Sorry, but that's not how relativity works. You may define your own system and champion its advantages, and if you're successful others may also adopt your system. But to call that system relativity is simply sowing confusion. We're back to the Humpty-Dumpty world in which words mean whatever we choose them to mean without regard to their common usage. Is that really your intent here? Here's just one aspect of relativity which doesn't fit with your new definition: Neither time nor space are constants. The "size" of space varies. The "duration" of time varies. And they do so according to precise mathematical relationships which have nothing to do with prime numbers.

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (10095)	2/4/2002 11:21:02 PM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"natural" isn't "spiritual." or ONE !!!!! 11111 1! I'd like to say I take the time to read your whole posts Fred, but even you have to admit, if you've read ONE !111!!!1!!1!!!!!!!!!111!!!! of your posts you have read them all. We will all miss you when Nibiru arrives.