Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (43263)	2/4/2002 1:48:49 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

And have you talked about anyone on threads on which they can't reply? Not to my knowledge, no. If I have, it was an oversight. I don't believe in doing that. You still haven't said whether you do or not. I note, btw, that Poet does not identify you by name or handle in this post on IHub: Did you have any question who she was referring to? And then, you were the one who linked the two together, weren't you? If it wrere the case that that kind of thinly veiled reference doesn'tt count as referring to a person, then I would never have had any trouble with SI. I would have been happy never to mention Poet by name, or post directly to her. That was never the issue.

To: E who wrote (43263)	2/4/2002 1:51:07 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I have been talked about ad nauseum on the RWer thread. What is your position on that? My position is that it is wrong. If you check, you'll see that I haven't posted on RWET for quite a long time. While this doesn't show up, nor have I read the thread for a long time. So I haven't seen that. But no, I don't think it's right. I think it should be a violation of the TOU to talk about people on a thread which they're moderated off of. Which is just one of the problems with moderated threads generally.