Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (26852)	2/4/2002 4:09:56 PM
From: Softechie	Respond to of 99280

AND NOT SAN SUCKERS..

To: TREND1 who wrote (26852)	2/4/2002 4:13:04 PM
From: Crimson Ghost	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Larry: I don't think trading via the Fed model will work as well as it has in the past. As I have said this model makes no adjustment for earnings quality which has fallen off a cliff in recent years. I also feel that the era where stocks never stayed undervalued (via the fed model) for more than a few weeks at a time is coming to an end.

To: TREND1 who wrote (26852)	2/4/2002 4:15:13 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

how far did SPX go to undervalued,in %(per the Fed Model) before the last reversal commenced,Larry?

To: TREND1 who wrote (26852)	2/4/2002 4:18:22 PM
From: ajtj99	Respond to of 99280

Lucky Hal doesn't have any nuts, Larry, as he'd probably have them handed to him over the next few weeks if he embarks on buying based on the Fed model today.

To: TREND1 who wrote (26852)	2/4/2002 4:21:17 PM
From: T L Comiskey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

L...re ..undervalued Please post the near term 'Sure Things'...<g>. tia watcha think about Drooy...? up FAT today.... Tim