SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: russet who wrote (185)2/5/2002 2:01:27 AM
From: bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 613
 
Yes, 2.5 carats at 65.00 a carat.



To: russet who wrote (185)2/5/2002 8:29:59 AM
From: jpthoma1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 613
 
Here are my choices:

Since much of the kimberlite material is coming from crater facies (See the Dec. 20 2000 press release), I guess they'll find some large diamonds. Don't forget too that they may need money for their 2002 exploration program (see Oct. 31 press releale). They «must» find large diamonds.

So I will go for a 12.138mm by 9.78mm by 8.56mm, 8.34 carats, inclusion free, but broken, very nice diamonds.

Unfortunately, the population distribution (remember the 2 populations!) will have an impact on grade and value. So my guess is 0.89 cpt and $117.86 by carat.

Let's diamond!!!!!

JP



To: russet who wrote (185)2/5/2002 11:16:35 AM
From: russet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 613
 
Now we're cooking,...looks like expectations are high.
Changes, additions and corrections are welcome.

The TWG.t spring 2002 Jackson Inlet minibulk guess the diamond values contest.

A free cyberdrink of your choice to whoever wins (gggggggg)

Biggest Grade Value per
Diamond c/tonne Carat($US)

Letmebe Frank 5.1 carats 0.3 $250/ct
Will P 3.3
Russett 2.0 1.0 200
SH rumor 50.0
bill 2.5 65
Bob Fairchild 4.5 0.25 175
jpthoma1 8.34 0.89 117.86