SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (619)2/5/2002 7:51:09 AM
From: robert b furman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 207417
 
Good Morning GZ,

Looks to me like Enronitis about to take down the BKX.X :
siliconinvestor.com

If that happens the Sox.x is precariously perched:

We may have a failed rally that needs to get cleared up first - by then the recovery's numbers will be in.

Those numbers will probably be much clearer with less creativity - the smoke and mirror Bullsh*t from past flyers needs to get purged first.

I've got a bad feeling that Mr. Market needs to throw up before he starts feeling better.



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (619)2/5/2002 7:59:11 AM
From: Moominoid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 207417
 
Using the Edwardss and Magee terminology we have a wedge and an inverted head and shoulders bottom - though the RHS shoulder is a little below the head. Apparently the volume is falling off. From the e-wave persepctive I think the whole thing is a wave 5 which if true would imply that the traditional interpretation (i.e. a move to 2050 at least will happen).

In the northern summer of 2001 everyone was looking at a wedge (I was just starting to learn about e-wave). All thsoe e-wavers on CFZ were also talking about the wedge and it failed. e-wave could have told you that it wouldn't work as a wedge because it was in the wrong position. A lot of the e-wave people out there don't seem to really understand much about it and reading all their stuff is why I thought also the method was useless. Still to prove how useful it really is though.....

David