Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (43449)	2/5/2002 11:12:37 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Hmmmm?? Seems to be a little of the pot and the kettle going on here. Message 17013729 The post to me was essentially an effort to shut me out of the conversation. Normally it would not be but in the context of the Poet (don't post to me any more) vs CH debate it has the same virtual effect.

To: Bill who wrote (43449)	2/5/2002 11:29:02 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

What a gratuitously and atypically nasty post. Here is my response. I didn't provide the links because I didn't have them until JLA mentioned the second thread he moderated. I did not imply it was the RWET, in fact said more than once that it wasn't. What I said about CR's post was this: That is CR's take on my behavior. It was. Below are comments and cracks made after I was no longer able to rebutt them. There is more than one crack, sometimes more than one nasty characterization in one post, and they are by more than one poster, you will note. I do not accuse you of lying, but of overlooking: pompous, condescending crapola. If "Bin Laundry List" isn't obviously spooflike enough for your delicate PC sensiblilites, I really don't give a damn. Take you stuck up, holier than thou attitude, and stuff it. I'm tired of being lectured by this hypocrite.... [that last comment I see was made to you, Bill. i had forgotten you were a participant in that discussion, and guess that explains this inaccurate post of yours.] [addressed to JLA]: You truly have thick skin. I had enough of that shit by the second post. Thank you for sending it back to the LWP or wherever it is that it hangs out. LOL! Damn, I agree. You can't even have a little fun with a humorous concept..... I don't tolerate condescending pompous lectures from hypocrites very well. Rather, it's the question of whether or not one wishes to spend time being lectured by someone with an agenda. Thank you, thank you, thank you. M She has called in her laundry list of friends to stick up for her. [Untrue, I called in no one] If BIA is the best artillery E can call out to gang up on you, you'll be just fine ! [Again, I did not call in bia and resent the assertion that I did, an assertion I was unable to respond to. I don't call for assistance, ever]