SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Benes who wrote (81546)2/5/2002 12:35:29 PM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116815
 
I really think most that remain here have mostly producing names with real assets production reserves. I'd bet that most of us though having the bulk in what have been bigger names also have a few dollars in some pennies. Heck, we've here seen hedge books melt down of a few prior "decent names" & just saw the meltdown a major US Natural Gas supplier & the 7 largest company in the US. Could those on the VSE be that much worse than Enron?

Gold up $3.20!
quotes.ino.com



To: Ken Benes who wrote (81546)2/5/2002 12:50:59 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116815
 
And really hasn't the extended "gold sucks" period cleaned out many-most of the small "holes in the ground surrounded by crooks"? That a company even survived this period of history has been somewhat a test by fire, but I'm not sure we might not see another hedge book of two melt down - but these would be "good names" not the non-producing jr's.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News