Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DOUG H who wrote (1297)	2/5/2002 2:53:17 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 3602

As you might imagine we have many long drawn out discussions. Me, with my thick skull, and he with his propensity to make a short story long..... Uhh, Doug, I've found to my delight that when WS gets wound up, the short story has always turned out to be the wrong story... <g> FDR, eh? I didn't know that. Didn't the religious police come around to remove his icons?

To: DOUG H who wrote (1297)	2/5/2002 3:02:04 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 3602

Enron liability may depend on memo... msnbc.com Regards, Scott btw, Mr. Lay and The Enron Board may have violated certain key fiduciary responsibilities...It's also becoming apparent that Mr. Lay may possibly have commited fraud as well as insider trading...it depends on whether he took action to conceal things or gain benefits when he had material insider information. I will not judge him today. Yet, things don't look good for Mr. Lay. He CAN NOT blame everything on his insider auditors or on Andersen. They will be held accountable too. We've only seen the tip of the iceberg so far....stay tuned.