Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (10505)	2/6/2002 12:40:56 PM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

That's funny, but to their credit the Clintons did return everything once the outcry arose that priceless antiques were missing upon their departure. That's kind of like the time Columba Bush returned from a European vacation with $20,000 worth of goods and only declared $500 for customs. When she was detained for her falsehood she forked over the $5,000 in duty and penalties and apologized, saying she was embarrassed (that she was caught).

To: Zoltan! who wrote (10505)	2/6/2002 12:44:15 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

With some people, no matter what you do, you never get ahead. Take our, um, allies and assorted overseas friends, who lately have been beating a sturdy tattoo on the American noggin. It isn't that we didn't just extinguish an evil regime in Afghanistan or that we refuse to export investment capital and make needed loans. The problem seemingly is that we are too powerful and too prosperous. This was a great article ... More at dallasnews.com.

To: Zoltan! who wrote (10505)	2/6/2002 1:09:34 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Thus, Europeans of the distinctly leftish variety – the main sort now exercising power – take fright that President Bush has identified an "axis of evil" that must be broken sooner or later for the whole world's good and with never (apparently) a side glance at the woes and grievances of the Palestinians. Thus, at the World Economic Forum in New York City, the United States drew raps for insufficient attention to other people's afflictions; for instance, poverty and hunger. Now, this is the sort of thing you get used to in international dealings when your country is the world's most powerful, the cynosure of jealous eyes. Foreign critics tend to vent jealousy and spite. In the face of which the delicious advice of one of Britain's empire builders comes to mind: "Never apologize. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl." That is how you conduct a foreign policy. Nobody since the Victorians has been quite up to the task. The current world split isn't properly along us vs. them lines; it concerns statism vs. capitalism and democracy. Statism, when it comes to prosperity, is a bust. The state drags down, rather than lifts up, working people; but to statists the ideology of the state is what counts, thus making it appropriate to blast the capitalists. Americans shouldn't get the impression their country has committed any offense other than success. The successful, as statists see them, are heartless and – you can see it coming on in discussions of the Enron fiasco – crooked. The left doesn't love success; it loves victimhood. You never can do enough, it seems, for victims. No wonder Israel regularly gets it in the neck from these folk. Israel is a remarkable success. The Palestinian regime of Yasser Arafat clings to victimhood; thus, it is an egregious failure. It really is worse than that. All other Arab regimes in the immediate vicinity are failures to one degree or another – moderate Jordan, with a succession of sensible kings, being the most presentable of the lot. Current European and Arab wisdom is that until the Palestinian Problem is successfully addressed, the Islamic world never will find peace. Alas, the Palestinian Problem is self-created. Israel is democratic, a boast no Arab nation can make. Israel – despite a residual commitment to the socialist ideal – generally supports the profit motive and lavishly approves of hard work. Arab economies are run from the top, with maximum benefit accruing to those who sit at the top (e.g., the House of Saud). What the United States is supposed to do about all this is unclear, which isn't too surprising. The jealous normally will bash the successful with any club that comes to hand. The envy of the outside world – the logical consequence of achievement in its varied forms – may be destined to warp U.S.-everybody else relations to a degree. It is as though the world would like us better if we had 250,000 troops bogged down outside Kandahar, unable to move. What is sorrowful is watching prominent Americans smile understandingly as the foreigners rant. Bill Gates commends anti-globalist demonstrators for "raising the question of 'Is the richer world giving back enough?' " And Hillary Rodham Clinton answers his question with, "We've not done our fair share." What would that fair share amount to? Best not to ask. Fair-share demands have more to do with expressing resentment than with actually wringing measurable benefits out of the United States. Call it the price of American success. There are worse ways to live – e.g., under the heavy fat thumb of Yasser Arafat. At the link below.http:// www.dallasnews.com/opinion/viewpoints/stories/murchison_06edi.ART.56fa9.html