SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (47489)2/6/2002 1:11:05 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
STREET WISE -- "Enronitis": A Disease -- and a Cure

Daily Briefing: STREET WISE
BusinessWeek Online
By Eric Wahlgren
Wednesday February 6, 7:53 am Eastern Time

It's about time the market had an Enron scandal. Don't get me wrong: It's horrible that thousands of employees lost their life savings and at least as many investors blew buckets of cash because of the energy trader's alleged fondness for funny business accounting. Let's hope Congress and regulators in Washington find ways to prevent another Enron -- and provide some restitution for those caught in the fallout while they're at it.

Going forward, however, this scandal may be a healthy thing, providing the kick in the pants that companies -- as well as the accountants who audit them and the analysts who rate them -- needed. ``In the long run, we'll get crystal-clear earnings, and analysts will get on the ball and do their job,'' says Jim Stanton, editor of the Low-Risk Strategy newsletter. ``Once the dust clears, this will be good for markets.''

That's a hard concept to grasp right now. Since hitting a post-September 11 high on Jan. 4 of 1,172.51, the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index has fallen off some 7%, as accounting practices at other companies have come under scrutiny. Conglomerate Tyco International (NYSE:TYC - news) took another beating on Feb. 5, closing down nearly 23%, to $23.10. ``This is an Agatha Christie market,'' says Alan Ackerman, market strategist at Fahnestock & Co. in New York. ``It's a 'whodunit?' now.''

DON'T PANIC. Sure, more accounting problems could surface, and questions may be raised that temporarily depress the stock values of outfits with perfectly sound balance sheets. Smart investors won't panic, however. ``Enronitis'' -- the fear that accounting problems could plague untold numbers of companies -- is simply a trigger for a much-needed correction. ``When markets get overvalued, you never know what is going to come along and pop the balloon,'' says Don Luskin, chief investment strategist at investment firm TrendMacrolytics. ``It could be anything. It just happens to be Enron this time.''

Before Enronitis spread in January, the market had roared back in the wake of the September 11 attacks. By Jan. 4, the S&P 500-stock index had surged 21% since its post-attack low of 965.80 -- and the Nasdaq leaped by 45%.

Despite recent declines, S&P 500 stocks on average are still trading at 21 times earnings. That compares to the index' p-e ratio range of 11 to 20 before the late 1990s market boom, says Shannon Reid, portfolio manager of the Evergreen Select Strategic Growth Fund. ``Even right now, this market is not cheaply valued,'' says Reid. ``It is anticipating an [economic] upturn. If we don't start to see one, certainly those multiples could come into question.''

SLIPPERY CONDITIONS. Portfolio realignment is one thing, but now is probably not the time to be building up positions in stocks as they likely will trade sideways for a while. Jean Keller, president of investment firm Lombard Odier, sees stocks treading water for the next month or two. ``I would expect everything to be flushed out in the first quarter,'' Keller adds.

What to do? Given the welcome increase in accounting scrutiny, investors will do best with stocks that have good balance sheets and strong cash flow, says Ackerman. He suggests biggies such as pharmaceutical company Pfizer (NYSE:PFE - news) and PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP - news), the beverage and snack-food giant. Adds Ackerman: ``Look for companies whose businesses are easily understood, where the cash flow is strong, and with management that has been through difficult markets before.''

In technology, Reid says he would focus on name brands like networking gearmaker Cisco Systems (NasdaqNM:CSCO) and Siebel (NasdaqNM:SEBL), which produces customer-relationship management software. ``You really want to stay with industry leaders who have been able to take market share and take advantage of their competitors' weakness in a downturn,'' Reid says.

BURDEN OF SUSPICION. Stanton is advising clients to stay on the sidelines for now. ``I'm just waiting,'' he says. ``It's slippery out there.'' And Luskin says to consider lightening up on stocks that carry too-high valuations. ``Those are the ones where, if lightning does strike, you're out 50% instead of 10%,'' he says. Other stocks he says you might want to sell: those of companies with high levels of debt and cash flows not sufficiently robust to service that debt. ``If you don't get that economic upturn, these companies will have some pretty massive hits,'' agrees Reid.

Another factor to consider: The timing of the economic rebound is still up in the air. The surprising preliminary government estimate that the economy grew slightly in the fourth quarter of 2001 gives hope that things aren't so bad after all. But even though consumer spending has held up, business spending has yet to kick in.

Until companies start laying out cash to boost output and enhance their competitive position, the economy won't really get rolling, says A.C. Moore, chief investment strategist at Dunvegan Associates. He's betting on a capital-spending revival late this year or early 2003.

JUST ``A HICCUP''?In the near term, new revelations of impropriety at other top companies could prolong the market's slump. In general, companies have become too bold about stretching the rules to present the rosiest possible earnings picture. Says Moore: ``The Enron debacle is unusual in terms of its scope, but it's not unusual with respect to its occurrence.''

Still, ``counterbalancing the Enron situation is the fact that many, many times over, companies are doing what they have always done, which is giving proper statistics to investors.'' Over the long haul, says Alan Hoffman, senior portfolio manager at Value Line Asset Management, the Enron scandal is ``a hiccup, not a 12-car pile-up.''

As the investigation of Enron continues, there's no doubt companies with complicated financial structures will now carry an additional risk premium, says Luskin, which could be reflected in a lower stock price. And while Enronitis has caused the market to wobble, a free fall doesn't appear to be inevitable. Stay cool -- and stay tuned -- is the best advice for most investors.

Go to www.businessweek.com to see all of our latest stories.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (47489)2/6/2002 1:33:50 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Saudis: 15 Hijackers Were Citizens


Wednesday February 6

By DONNA ABU-NASR, Associated Press Writer

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) - Saudi Arabia acknowledged for the first time that 15 of the Sept. 11 suicide hijackers were Saudi citizens, but said Wednesday that the oil-rich kingdom bears no responsibility for their actions.

Previously, Saudi Arabia had said the citizenship of 15 of the 19 hijackers was in doubt despite U.S. insistence they were Saudis. But Interior Minister Prince Nayef told The Associated Press that Saudi leaders were shocked to learn 15 of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.

``The names that we got confirmed that,'' Nayef said in an interview. ``Their families have been notified.''

Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) - the chief suspect in the World Trade Center and Pentagon (news - web sites) attacks the killed more than 3,000 people - was Saudi born but stripped of his citizenship in 1994.

Asked if he had information on whether bin Laden was dead or alive, Nayef said: ``We have no information and we have no interest in this subject.''

Nayef also said the kingdom has detained about 30 people since the attacks, based on lists provided by the United States. Some have been released.

Nayef said the men still in detention ``have been influenced by bin Laden's thinking.''

``It's possible that we will find among them members of (bin Laden's al-Qaida) organization,'' he added. ``But so far we haven't found anything.''

Nayef said the measures were not in response to any pressure from the United States, ``but we welcome any information that's provided to us and we want to be cooperative.''

Nayef said it was natural that the kingdom had not noticed the 15 hijackers beforehand.

``How can I place the name of a Saudi on a blacklist when I have nothing to justify the action? The Saudis are free to travel wherever they like,'' he said. ``If we had known they were going to do what they had done, we would have stopped them.

``I believe they were taken advantage of in the name of religion and regarding certain issues pertaining to the Arab nation, especially the issue of Palestine,'' said Nayef.

Nayef said Saudi Arabia is not responsible for the actions of the hijackers.

``This is the truth ... and I defy anyone to prove it,'' he added.

Nayef said that Saudi banks have not frozen any bank accounts. He also said that Saudi charities ``won't be allowed by the state or those who work in them ... to be used for other purposes. But you cannot guarantee that a person or more could misuse'' their responsibilities.

The United States has accused some Islamic charities of funding terrorist operations. The Saudi-based Wafa Humanitarian Organization, whose operations include food distribution and construction of a clinic in the Afghan capital, Kabul, is on a U.S. list of terrorist organizations.

U.S.-Saudi relations have been strained in the wake of Sept. 11, with criticism from the United States that the Saudis are doing too little to hunt down terrorist links in the kingdom. The Saudis counter that they are being unfairly accused because of the actions of a few, and claim criticism in the U.S. media is Israeli-inspired.

Nayef alleged Wednesday that Zionism was behind an ``unjustified'' anti-Saudi campaign in the United States.

``Most of the American media could not understand us well and we didn't see any desire on their part to understand us,'' he said.

He also said the Islam preached and taught in Saudi Arabia rejects extremism.

``We are not Taliban,'' he said, referring to the extremist Islamic militia that once ruled Afghanistan (news - web sites) and harbored bin Laden. ``We believe and live by the right Islam.''

Nayef said the United States should ``take a just and evenhanded stand'' in the Mideast peace process and not provide ``unqualified'' support for Israel if it wants to improve its image in the region.

Nayef dismissed reports that speak of widespread popularity for bin Laden in the kingdom.

Asked if Saudi Arabia was worried about possible pro-bin Laden demonstrations during the hajj - the annual pilgrimage to the holy city of Mecca - this year, Nayef said: ``Inshallah (God willing), there won't be, but as security people we don't dismiss anything. We are ready and determined to prevent anything disrupting security in the hajj.''

Nayef said bin Laden was a ``tool'' of others rather than the mastermind of the attacks against the World Trade Center, Pentagon and in Pennsylvania. He did not say who he thought was the mastermind.

The prince said there was no evidence so far of al-Qaida cells operating in Saudi Arabia, but added:

``There may be a limited number of people that we don't know about.''

He promised ``no mercy'' for any al-Qaida radicals discovered ``just as we showed no mercy before Sept. 11.''

He said the number of Saudi among the suspected al-Qaida and Taliban prisoners held by the United States at a Navy base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, was just over 50 and not 100 as reported earlier. He said the kingdom was checking on their names.