Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sun-tzu who wrote (149421)	2/6/2002 3:25:25 PM
From: sun-tzu	Respond to of 436258

out TQNT -.05

To: sun-tzu who wrote (149421)	2/6/2002 3:26:28 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

cool with me ... seems balanced to do some bottom fishing with the momo stuff.

To: sun-tzu who wrote (149421)	2/6/2002 3:47:28 PM
From: reaper	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

I'm going to nitpick you again: <<the chart just completed a successful double bottom. a little NG play here makes reasonable sense to me>> The STOCKS already discount a significant rebound in NG. Patterson/UTI energy (PTEN), a US land driller that probably has the most leveraged earnings to a rebound in NG activity, is at $21 despite estimates of 7 pennies in Q1:01 and 1 penny in Q2:01. The NG stocks have been going up while NG has been falling. I too am bullish on NG. I was long Patterson (sold at +/- $18) and am still long Pride (leverage from shallow water GOM drilling assets, in addition to stable int'l and deepwater oil assets). But it seems to me that way too many hedgies are bullish on the NG stocks; crowded trade (like the Amazon short <g>), which is making me re-think my bullish position. If you're so bullish on NG, why not just go long NG futures? Often wrong, never in doubt (nor ever lacking an opinion <g>) Cheers