Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (18184)	2/6/2002 5:18:41 PM
From: FaultLine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

I've read a little of O'Hanlon's work this past year and I've found it interesting and persuasive. IMO the pieces I've read have been well informed, hard-nosed and with a healthy skepticism about political BS from all sides. He calls himself and his ilk, "Cheap Hawks" and has written numerous papers, books, and OpEd pieces to that end. Here's an excerpt of his extensive bio package at Brookings (not including the pubs list as long as your arm many of which are available on-line at the Brookings site). brookings.org Michael E. O'Hanlon Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Studies Expertise Arms treaties, Asian security issues, civil warfare, European security issues, military technology, missile defense, peacekeeping operations, U.S. defense strategy and budget Current Project: 2001-2002 defense budget; national missile defense Background Adjunct Professor, Columbia University; Adjunct Professor, Georgetown University; former Defense and Foreign Policy Budget Analyst, National Security Division, Congressional Budget Office (1989-94); former Research Assistant, Institute for Defense Analyses; former Peace Corps Volunteer, Congo Education: A.B., Princeton University, 1982; M.S.E., Princeton University, 1987; M.A., Princeton University, 1988; Ph.D., Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, 1991 Here's a good article in FA: Star Wars Strikes Back by Michael O'Hanlon From Foreign Affairs, November/December 1999 foreignaffairs.org SUMMARY Ronald Reagan's dream never died; it only faded slightly. Star Wars is still with us in a scaled-back form. Although theater missile defenses -- popularized by the Gulf War's Patriots -- are now widely accepted, debate still rages over a nationwide system. Republicans worry about rogue states and terrorists with nukes, Democrats worry about angering Russia and violating treaty obligations, and neither side listens to the other. America is pouring billions of dollars into research and development, ignoring the fundamental flaws that missile defense has yet to overcome. His OpEd piece in the LA Times and Jan. 28, critiquing the propose massive increases in the DOD's budget, is worth a read too: Saluting the Military's Wishes Has a Penalty Los Angeles Times, January 28, 2002 Michael E. O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Studies brookings.org The Bush administration has announced that it will seek an increase of $48 billion in next year's military budget, bringing it to roughly $390 billion. Even in these times, it is unnecessarily high and takes money away from other more needed domestic programs. To get a sense of how big the proposed budget increase would be, consider a few facts. Adjusting for inflation, this would be the largest year-to-year increase in the defense budget since the Korean War. American defense spending would exceed the Cold War norm and almost equal the Reagan-era average. It would exceed Russia's or China's military budget almost tenfold. ...